MyData:What Is MyData? | Login/Account Info | Download Saved Files | Logout
Description & Citation--Study No. 3013 | |
Bibliographic Description | |
| ICPSR Study No.: | 3013 |
|---|---|
| Persistent URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03013 |
| Title: | Reconsidering Domestic Violence Recidivism: Individual and Contextual Effects of Court Dispositions and Stake in Conformity in Hamilton County, Ohio, 1993-1998 |
| Principal Investigator(s): | John Wooldredge, University of Cincinnati |
| Funding Agency: | United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice. |
| Grant Number: | 95-IJ-CX-0102 |
| Bibliographic Citation: | Wooldredge, John. RECONSIDERING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RECIDIVISM: INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS OF COURT DISPOSITIONS AND STAKE IN CONFORMITY IN HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, 1993-1998 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000. doi:10.3886/ICPSR03013 |
Scope of Study | |
| Summary: | This study examined empirical relationships between various court dispositions and the prevalence, incidence, and delay of domestic violence recidivism. It built on past research by examining the possible effects of formal and informal social controls at the individual level, as well as the contextual effects of community characteristics on individual behavior. The researchers collected information on 3,662 suspects arrested for misdemeanor domestic violence (specifically, assault against an intimate) in Hamilton County, Ohio, during August 1, 1993, to October 31, 1993, and January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996. All arrestees in the sample were tracked until June 1998. The dataset includes information pertaining to demographic and background characteristics of suspects (e.g., race, age, means of support, education, employment, marital status, residential stability, number of children the suspect had, and if the suspect lived with a spouse and/or children at arrest), their criminal histories (prior convictions for misdemeanors and felonies, prior incarceration, alcohol/drug addiction, and pending charges), how their cases were disposed (e.g., no charges filed, charges dropped, acquitted at trial, sentenced to an offender program, probation, or jail), rearrests for domestic violence that occurred between the initial arrest and May 31, 1998, and the number of months that elapsed between case disposition and rearrest. |
| Subject Term(s): | arrest records, communities, criminal histories, dispositions (legal), domestic violence, offenders, recidivism |
| Geographic Coverage: | Ohio, United States |
| Time Period: | 1993 - 1998 |
| Date(s) of Collection: | 1995 - 1998 |
| Unit of Observation: | Individuals. |
| Universe: | Persons arrested for misdemeanor domestic violence in Hamilton County, Ohio. |
| Data Type: | administrative records data, event/transaction data, and census/enumeration data |
| Data Collection Notes: | A user guide and a codebook are provided by ICPSR as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Website. |
Methodology | |
| Purpose of the Study: | Mandatory arrest policies in cases of misdemeanor domestic violence were implemented in many jurisdictions across the United States during the 1980s. However, the true success of arrest alone in preventing or delaying recidivism remains unknown. Furthermore, the effectiveness of arrest might hinge on whether arrestees are actually prosecuted and convicted, and whether they are placed on probation and/or serve a jail sentence. This study examined empirical relationships between various court dispositions and the prevalence, incidence, and delay of domestic violence recidivism. It built on past research by examining the possible effects of formal and informal social controls at the individual level, as well as the contextual effects of community characteristics on individual behavior. Aggregate-level census measures (proportion of college-educated individuals, proportion of employed individuals, proportion of financially independent residents, etc.) were included to determine the extent that these neighborhood characteristics correlate to an individual's propensity to recidivate and/or conditioned relationships between formal controls and recidivism. |
| Study Design: | To study empirical relationships between court dispositions and the prevalence, incidence, and delay of recidivism for domestic violence, the researchers collected information on 3,662 suspects arrested for misdemeanor domestic violence in Hamilton County, Ohio, during August 1, 1993, to October 31, 1993, and January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996. All arrestees in the sample were tracked until June 1998. The individual-level data were compiled from arrest reports, intake interview forms, and court records. Intake interview data provided the demographic and legal characteristics of suspects and information on their initial arrests, court records provided disposition information, and arrest reports provided the dates and types of all rearrests until May 31, 1998. The census tract data were obtained from the 1990 United States Census of Population and Housing. |
| Sample: | The sample consists of all persons arrested for misdemeanor domestic violence (specifically, assault against an intimate) in Hamilton County, Ohio, during two time periods: August 1-October 31, 1993, and January 1, 1995-December 31, 1996. |
| Data Source: | arrest reports, intake interview forms, court records, and the 1990 United States Census of Population and Housing |
| Description of Variables: | The dataset includes information pertaining to demographic and background characteristics of suspects (e.g., race, age, means of support, education, employment, marital status, residential stability, number of children the suspect had, and if the suspect lived with a spouse and/or children at arrest), their criminal histories (prior convictions for misdemeanors and felonies, prior incarceration, alcohol/drug addiction, and pending charges), how their cases were disposed (e.g., no charges filed, charges dropped, acquitted at trial, sentenced to an offender program, probation, or jail), rearrests for domestic violence that occurred between the initial arrests and May 31, 1998, and the number of months that elapsed between case disposition and rearrest. |
| Response Rates: | Not applicable. |
| Presence of Common Scales: | None. |
Access and Availability | |
| Note: | A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the file manifest. |
| Original ICPSR Release: | 2000-10-05 |
| Dataset(s): |
|
