Description & Citation--Study No. 4298 | |
Bibliographic Description | |
| ICPSR Study No.: | 4298 |
|---|---|
| Persistent URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04298 |
| Title: | Partnership Impact Research Project, 2001-2004 [United States] |
| Principal Investigator(s): | Diane Schilder, Education Development Center, Inc. Center for Children & Families |
| Funding Agency: | United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families (ACF). Child Care Bureau |
| Grant Number: | 90YE037 |
| Bibliographic Citation: | Schilder, Diane. PARTNERSHIP IMPACT RESEARCH PROJECT, 2001-2004 [UNITED STATES] [Computer file]. ICPSR04298-v1. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc. [producer], 2005. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2006-04-17. doi:10.3886/ICPSR04298 |
Scope of Study | |
| Summary: | The Partnership Impact Research Project is a three-year study designed to assess the nature of early education partnerships among Head Start, pre-kindergarten (pre-k), child care, and early care and education programs and their influence on child care quality and access to services. The project analyzes qualitative data in an existing database that was collected by the Quality in Linking Together (QUILT) Early Education Partnerships (link) initiative. The QUILT database was designed to provide training and technical assistance in the development and sustainment of partnerships to professionals across the nation, including early care and education providers and state leaders. It is divided into two sections: state-level and local provider-level information. Both sections contain narratives, factual data, and documents. Additionally, the project collected new quantitative and qualitative data from randomly selected child care and Head Start providers in Ohio to study the influence of partnerships on the quality of and access to services. The Partnership Impact Research Project explored questions about partnerships and their impact on child care and parents while attempting to determine whether state actions could influence both the development of provider-level partnerships and the processes partnerships engage in to sustain their work. Specifically, the study was designed to address the following objectives:
The six datasets associated with this data collection are summarized below:
|
| Subject Term(s): | child care, classroom environment, early childhood education, Early Head Start, educational programs, funding, Head Start, low income groups, preschool children, preschool education, schools, teacher attitudes, teacher education, teacher qualifications, teacher student relationship, teaching conditions, training |
| Geographic Coverage: | United States |
| Time Period: | 2001 - 2004 |
| Date(s) of Collection: | 2001 - 2004 |
| Unit of Observation: | child care centers, child care providers |
| Universe: | The sample in the state profiles section of the QUILT database represents early care and education stakeholders from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The sample in the provider section of the database represents over 200 providers in partnerships from 36 states, Puerto Rico, a tribal nation, and each region in the country. |
| Data Type: | survey data |
| Data Collection Notes: | The Child Care Bureau and Head Start Bureau jointly fund the QUILT, which is comprised of three organizations: Community Development Institute (CDI), Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC), and the National Child Care Information Center (NCCIC). EDC is responsible for designing and maintaining the QUILT state and provider partnership profiles database, accessible through the QUILT Web site (link) hosted by CDI. |
Methodology | |
| Purpose of the Study: | n/a |
| Study Design: | The Partnership Impact Research Project adopted the QUILT project's taxonomy to categorize local partnership structures into three types:
Year One of the study focused on a qualitative analysis to explain partnership approaches at the state and local levels and to produce a report for national dissemination to a variety of audiences. During project Year Two and Year Three, the focus was on the influence of provider-level partnership practices on quality and access. Year One Methodology During the first year of the project, a standardized case study approach was used to analyze the state- and provider-level data in the QUILT partnership profiles database. Additionally, research literature about partnerships was reviewed as well as studies of state early care and education funding and policies. Two research questions framed the Year One analysis and writing: (1) How are states across the country supporting and promoting early care and education partnerships? (2) How are early care and education providers engaging in partnerships? To address these questions, two separate case studies were utilized: State-Level Case Study: Data sources included reviews of documents produced by national organizations and by states as well as interviews with state child care administrators, Head Start-State Collaboration directors, state pre-k directors, and directors of agencies responsible for early care and education services. The state factual data include links to state early care and education web pages, state demographics, child care licensing regulations, eligibility criteria for early education programs, funding for early education programs, and numbers served, all of which are from secondary sources such as the census. Provider-Level Case Study: Data came from the 65 partnership profiles in the database and provided factual information for each. Questions focused on: partnership approach, partnership hours and days, number of children served by the partnership, total numbers served by the center, ages of children served by the partnership and by partnering organizations, funding used to support the partnership, partnership setting, services offered, and the primary objective for partnering. Years Two and Three Methodology The second and third years of the project continued to examine the qualitative data across cross-cutting themes while also addressing questions about the influence of partnership on quality and access. In-depth longitudinal data collection continued and follow-up data was gathered from child care directors, teachers, parents, and from directors of Head Start programs partnering with child care centers. This portion of the project focused on: partnership processes, quality of services, parental access to services, duration of partnership, benefits/challenges of partnership, and child care quality. Additionally, detailed briefs were developed aimed at addressing specific questions posed by different audiences such as policymakers and providers. |
| Sample: | In both the state and provider (local) sections of the database, data are from a convenience sample selected to ensure a broad range of perspectives and to ensure methodological soundness to control for biases and to meet the criteria for credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The sample includes partnerships that represent a range of programs, communities, program sizes, target populations, funding sources and partnership settings. |
| Mode of Data Collection: | mail questionnaire |
| telephone interview | |
| face-to-face interview | |
Access and Availability | |
| Note: | A list of the data formats available for this study can be found in the summary of holdings. Detailed file-level information (such as record length, case count, and variable count) is listed in the file manifest. |
| Restrictions: | This data collection may not be used for any purpose other than statistical reporting and analysis. Use of these data to learn the identity of any person or establishment is prohibited. |
| Original ICPSR Release: | 2006-04-17 |
| Dataset(s): |
|
Careers | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Official Representative Site | Accessibility
© 2007 Regents of the University of Michigan. ICPSR is part of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.
