WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997: CUMULATIVE FILE FOR THE FIRST THREE WAVES (ICPSR 2790)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 3: Data Files Description
Part 4: Variable Description
Entire Codebook

Ole Borre and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Scope of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Document Description

Citation

Title:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997

Identification Number:

2790

Authoring Entity:

INGLEHART, RONALD. (University of Michigan)

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

et al.  (link)

Producer:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Copyright:

Copyright ICPSR, 2000

Date of Production:

May 30, 2000

Software used in Production:

SoftQuad XMetaL

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

National Science Foundation

Grant Number:

SBR-9617813

Distributor:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Date of Distribution:

May 30, 2000

Version:

ICPSR XML Version

Version Responsibility:

Sanda Ionescu

Bibliographic Citation:

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Codebook file]. ICPSR XML version. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 2000.

Holdings Information:

http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/DDI/SAMPLES/02790.xml

Documentation Source

Title:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997

Identification Number:

2790

Authoring Entity:

Inglehart, Ronald (University of Michigan)

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

et al.  (link)

Producer:

Institute for Social Research

Date of Production:

2000

Distributor:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Date of Distribution:

2000

Series Name:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS SERIES

Series Information:

This series began as a set of surveys conducted in ten West European societies by the European Value Systems Study Group (EVSSG). The World Values Survey (WVS) grew out of those surveys and was initiated in 1981 to study the values and attitudes of mass publics across nations of different economic, educational, and cultural backgrounds. The title of the series was changed to "World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys" with the addition of the 1995-1997 data. The WVS project explores the hypothesis that mass belief systems are changing in ways that have important economic, political, and social consequences. The surveys are based on stratified, multistage random samples of adult citizens aged 18 and older. The samples are selected in two stages. First, a random selection of sampling locations is made to ensure all types of locations are represented. Next, a random selection of individuals is drawn. Each study contains information from interviews conducted with 300 to 4,000 respondents per country. The samples for the 1995-1997 surveys are representative of societies with per capita incomes as low as $300 per year to $30,000 per year plus. The major substantive areas covered in all studies may be generally grouped as follows: - The importance of work, family, friends, leisure time, politics, and religion. - Attitudes toward government and religion, including how often respondents participated in group activities within religious and government organizations. - Perceptions of economic, ethnic, religious, and political groups and feelings of trust and closeness toward these groups. - Assessment of the relative importance of major problems facing the world and willingness to participate in solutions. - Self-reported assessments of happiness and class identity. Demographic information includes family income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home ownership, region of residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation, education, religion, religiosity, political party and union membership, and left-right political self-placement.

Bibliographic Citation:

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000.

Study Description

Citation

Title:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997: CUMULATIVE FILE FOR THE FIRST THREE WAVES

Identification Number:

2790

Authoring Entity:

Inglehart, Ronald

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marita Carballo de Cilley

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Gevork Pogosian

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Hans-Dieter Klingemann

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alan Black

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ali Aliev

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Q. K. Ahmad

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Andrei Vardomatskii

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Carlos Eduardo Meirelles Matheus

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Robert M. Worcester

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Antony Todorov

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marta Lagos

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Michael Guo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Carlos Lemoine

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

John Sudarsky

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vesna Pusic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Josefina Zaiter

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marcus Villaman

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Julio Valerion

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mikk Titma

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juhani Pehkonen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Merab Pachulia

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kareem Tejumola

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Pradeep Chhibber

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Subhasa Misra

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Seiko Yamazaki

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Yuji Fukuda

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kenji Iijima

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ilze Koroleva

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Rasa Alishauskiene

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Miguel Basanez

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alejandro Moreno

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ljubov Ishimova

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Goati

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jovanka Matic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Lilijana Bacevic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Dragomir Pantic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ola Listhaug

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Farooq Tanwir

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Catalina Romero

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alfredo Torres

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Linda Luz Guerrero

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mahar Mangahas

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Renata Siemienska

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Angel Rivera-Ortiz

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jorge Benitez-Nazario

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Elena Bashkirova

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Niko Tos

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Johann Mouton

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Anneke Greyling

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Robert Mattes

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mari Harris

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Soo Young Auh

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Sang-jin Han

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juan Diez Nicolas

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Ramon Torregrossa

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juan del Pino Artacho

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Luis Elzo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Luis Veira Veira

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Manuel Garcia Ferrando

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Thorleif Petterson

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Bi Puranen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Simon Hug

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Pascal Sciarini

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Hei-Yuan Chiu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Pi-chao Chen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jin-yun Liu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Yilmaz Esmer

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Olga Balakireva

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Cesar Aguiar

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Arocena

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Augustin Canzani

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Rafael Mendizabal

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

George Gallup

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alec Gallup

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Max Larsen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Gustavo Mendez

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Molina

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Friedrich Welsch

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Paul Zulehner

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Christian Friesl

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jan Kerkhofs

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Karel Dobbelaere

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jacques Rene Rabier

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

David Barker

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Stephen Harding

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Gordon Heald

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Noel Timms

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Andrei Raichev,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kancho Stoichev

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Neil Nevitte

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Carlos Huneeus

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jiang Xingrong

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Xiang Zongde

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Rak

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marek Boguszak

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ivan Gabal

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Peter Gundelach

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ole Riis,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Andrus Saar

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Leila Lotti

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Helene Riffault

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Renate Koecher

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Elemer Hankiss,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Robert Manchin,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Stefan Olafsson,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Fridrik Jonsson,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Eric da Costa

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

V.P. Madhok,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Michael Fogarty,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Renzo Gubert

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Brigita Zepa,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Yadov

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ruud de Moor

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Felix Heunks

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Loek Halman

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Luis de Franca

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jorge Vala

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

J.C. Jesumo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Andreyenkov

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Catalin Zamfir,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Nicolae Lotreanu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mattei Dogan

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Christine Woessner

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Francisco Andres Orizo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Javier Elzo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Anna Melich

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ustun Erguder,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ersin Kalaycioglu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

A.H. Ahmad

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kosta Barjaba

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Russell Dalton

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Blanka Filipcova

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Christian Haerpfer

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juan Linz

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

R. C. Pandit

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

The 1981-84 surveys were coordinated by the European Values Survey group under the leadership of Jan Kerkhofs and Ruud de Moor, with an advisory committee consisting of Gordon Heald, Juan Linz, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Jacques Rabier and Helene Riffault. The 1990-1993 surveys were coordinated by the World Values Survey group and the European Values Survey group. The second wave of surveys was designed and coordinated by the following steering committee: Ruud de Moor, chair; Jan Kerkhofs, co-chair; Karel Dobbelaere, Loek Halman, Stephen Harding, Felix Heunks, Ronald Inglehart, Renate Koecher, Jacques Rabier and Noel Timms. Inglehart organized the surveys in non-European countries and in several East European countries. The following steering committee was elected to guide the design and execution of the third wave: Ronald Inglehart, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. (chair); Elena Bashkirova, Russian Public Opinion and Market Research Institute, Moscow, Russia; Miguel Basanez, Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico; Hei-yuan Chiu, Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; Juan Diez-Nicolas, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Yilmaz Esmer, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey; Loek Halman, University of Tilburg, The Netherlands; Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Free University of Berlin and Berlin Science Center; Elone Nwabuzor, University of Benin, Benin, Nigeria; Thorleif Petterson, Uppsala University, Sweden; Renata Siemienska, University of Warsaw, Poland; Seiko Yamazaki, Dentsu Institute for Human Studies, Tokyo, Japan; Alan Webster, Massey University, North Palmerston, New Zealand; Klingemann coordinated fieldwork in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe. The EVS group did not participate in this wave. The 1995-1998 surveys were coordinated by Inglehart, who also assembled and documented this three-wave dataset.

Producer:

Institute for Social Research

Date of Production:

2000

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

National Science Foundation

Grant Number:

SBR 9422899

Distributor:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Date of Distribution:

2000

Series Name:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS SERIES

Series Information:

This series began as a set of surveys conducted in ten West European societies by the European Value Systems Study Group (EVSSG). The World Values Survey (WVS) grew out of those surveys and was initiated in 1981 to study the values and attitudes of mass publics across nations of different economic, educational, and cultural backgrounds. The title of the series was changed to "World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys" with the addition of the 1995-1997 data. The WVS project explores the hypothesis that mass belief systems are changing in ways that have important economic, political, and social consequences. The surveys are based on stratified, multistage random samples of adult citizens aged 18 and older. The samples are selected in two stages. First, a random selection of sampling locations is made to ensure all types of locations are represented. Next, a random selection of individuals is drawn. Each study contains information from interviews conducted with 300 to 4,000 respondents per country. The samples for the 1995-1997 surveys are representative of societies with per capita incomes as low as $300 per year to $30,000 per year plus. The major substantive areas covered in all studies may be generally grouped as follows: - The importance of work, family, friends, leisure time, politics, and religion. - Attitudes toward government and religion, including how often respondents participated in group activities within religious and government organizations. - Perceptions of economic, ethnic, religious, and political groups and feelings of trust and closeness toward these groups. - Assessment of the relative importance of major problems facing the world and willingness to participate in solutions. - Self-reported assessments of happiness and class identity. Demographic information includes family income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home ownership, region of residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation, education, religion, religiosity, political party and union membership, and left-right political self-placement.

Bibliographic Citation:

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000.

Study Scope

Topic Classification:

SOCIAL INDICATORS, B. Nations Other Than the United States

Abstract:

The series is designed to enable a crossnational comparison of values and norms on a wide variety of topics and to monitor changes in values and attitudes across the globe. This data collection consists of responses from WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1981-1983 (ICPSR 9309) and WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1981-1984 AND 1990-1993 (ICPSR 6160), along with data gathered during 1995-1997. Over 60 surveys representing more than 50 countries participated in the 1995-1997 study. The 1995 questionnaire retained those items that gave the most significant results from the 1981 and 1990 surveys. New topics pertaining to technology, social relationships, and parent-child relationships were added. Broad topics covered were work, personal finances, the economy, politics, allocation of resources, contemporary social issues, technology and its impact on society, and traditional values. Respondents were asked whether the following acts were ever justifiable: suicide, cheating on taxes, lying, euthanasia, divorce, and abortion. Respondents were also asked about the groups and associations they belonged to, which ones they worked for voluntarily, the groups they would not want as neighbors, their general state of health, and whether they felt they had free choice and control over their lives. A wide range of items was included on the meaning and purpose of life, such as respondents' views on the value of scientific advances, the demarcation of good and evil, and religious behavior and beliefs. Respondents were also queried about their attitudes toward religion, morality, politics, sexual freedom, marriage, single parenting, child-rearing, and the importance of work, family, politics, and religion in their lives. Questions relating to work included what financial and social benefits were most important to them in a job, the pride they took in their work, if they were happy with their current position, and their views on owner/state/employee management of business. Questions pertaining to the stability of the world economy, solutions for poverty, and whether respondents were happy with their financial situation were also asked. Respondents' opinions of various forms of political action, the most important aims for their countries, confidence in various civil and governmental institutions, and whether they would fight in a war for their country were also solicited. Demographic information includes family income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home ownership, region of residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation, education, religion, religiosity, political party and union membership, and left-right political self-placement.

The World Values Surveys grew out of a study launched by the European Values Survey group (EVS) under the leadership of Jan Kerkhofs and Ruud de Moor, with an advisory committee consisting of Gordon Heald, Juan Linz, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Jacques Rabier and Helene Riffault. In 1981, the EVS carried out surveys in ten West European societies; it evoked such widespread interest that it was replicated in 12 additional countries. Findings from these surveys suggested that pervasive and partially predictable cultural changes were taking place. To monitor these changes, a new wave of surveys was launched, this time designed to be carried out globally. The second wave of surveys was designed and coordinated by the following steering committee: Ruud de Moor, chair; Jan Kerkhofs, co-chair; Karel Dobbelaere, Loek Halman, Stephen Harding, Felix Heunks, Ronald Inglehart, Renate Koecher, Jacques Rabier and Noel Timms. Inglehart organized the surveys in non-European countries and in several East European countries. WVS Participants from nearly 40 societies on all six inhabited continents met in Spain in September 1993 to evaluate results of the first two waves of surveys. Coherent patterns of change in a wide range of key values were observed from 1981 to 1990. To monitor these changes and probe more deeply into their causes and consequences, the group agreed to carry out additional waves of research in 1995 and 2000; and began designing the 1995 wave. This wave gave special attention to obtaining better coverage of non-Western societies and to analyzing the development of a democratic political culture in the emerging Third Wave democracies. A fourth wave of surveys is being carried out jointly by the EVS and WVS groups, in 1999-2000. The usefulness of these surveys has grown as they have expanded to provide more complete coverage of the world's societies, and as the time series that they cover has grown longer. The 1981-83 survey covered 22 independent countries plus surveys in Northern Ireland and Tambov oblast of the Russian republic; the 1990-93 survey covered 42 independent countries plus surveys in Northern Ireland, and Greater Moscow; the 1995-97 survey covered 53 independent countries, plus surveys in Puerto Rico, Tambov oblast, Montenegro, the Andalusian, Basque, Galician and Valencian regions of Spain and a pilot survey in Ghana. In all, 64 independent countries have been surveyed in at least one wave of this investigation (counting East Germany as an independent country, which it was when first surveyed). These countries include almost 80 percent of the world's population. The World Values surveys provide a broader range of variation than has ever before been available for analyzing the impact of the values and beliefs of mass publics on political and social life. This unique data base makes it possible to examine cross-level linkages, such as that between public values and economic growth; or between environmental pollution and mass attitudes toward environmental protection; or that between political culture and democratic institutions. This project is a confederation of equal partners. It has been carried out with little central funding and hence, with minimal central control. In most countries, funding for fieldwork and analysis was obtained from local sources. In return for providing the data from a representative national sample of their own country, each participating group obtains immediate access to the data from all of the other surveys. They also become part of a global network of social scientists that interacts electronically and in international conferences, exchanging ideas and interpretations of the observed cross-national differences and changes over time. A major goal of this project has been to expand participation beyond the ranks of the advanced industrial societies to which most previous survey research has been limited, involving participants from developing countries and non-Western societies, and to transcend the boundaries that until recently divided the world into Eastern and Western blocs. There were two main reasons for doing so. The first was an intellectual purpose: the steering committee of the WVS was convinced that only by including the full range of economic, cultural and political variation, would it be possible to effectively analyze the sources of variation in human belief systems-and their impact on society. The second reason for adopting this strategy was in order to aid the diffusion of empirical social science techniques into societies in which they previously have been little used. We believe that survey research is likely to play an increasingly important role as societies develop, providing both social scientists and decision-makers with valuable information about mass beliefs and preferences. These two goals complement each other. Starting with the 1990 survey, participants from all six inhabited continents have been involved in the design, fieldwork, analysis and interpretation of the World Values Surveys. This many-sided interaction, involving people with a wide variety of perspectives, has enhanced the effectiveness of the World Values Survey. It has produced hundreds of publications in many languages. Even more important, it has enabled the World Values Survey to become a genuinely worldwide investigation, carried out by a global network of social scientists. The 1995-1997 study is the third wave of the WVS and includes more than 60 surveys, representing a majority of the world's population and ranging from societies with per capita incomes as low as $300 per year, to societies with per capita incomes as high as $30,000 per year; and from long-established democracies with market economies, to various types of authoritarian states. The 1990 World Values surveys were carried out in 43 societies, and the 1981 surveys were carried out in 22 societies, providing time series data for many societies, enabling us to analyze the changes in values and attitudes that took place during the years between the three sets of surveys. The 1995 questionnaire retains those items that gave the most significant results from the 1981 and 1990 surveys, replicating about 60 per cent of the 1990 questionnaire. The additional space made available was used to probe more deeply into key topics, particularly democratization and cultural change. The WVS project explores the hypothesis that mass belief systems are changing in ways that have important economic, political and social consequences. It does not assume either economic or cultural determinism: findings to date suggest that the relationships between values, economics and politics are reciprocal, with the exact nature of the linkages in given cases being an empirical question, rather than something that can be determined a priori. In most cases, the fieldwork for these surveys is supported by funding from within the given country. Each national team furnishes a copy of their data to the central coordinator at Ann Arbor, and in return receives the data from all participating countries. This arrangement has a powerful multiplier effect, enabling each national group to interpret their findings in a much broader, developmental and cross-cultural perspective.

Time Period:

1981 [1st wave]-1984 [1st wave]1990 [2nd wave]-1993 [2nd wave]1995 [3rd wave]-1997 [3rd wave]

Date of Collection:

1981 [Specific fieldwork period for each country and survey wave is shown in the "dataCollector" element]-1997 [Specific fieldwork period for each country and survey wave is shown in the "dataCollector" element]

Country:

FRANCE, BRITAIN, WEST-GERMANY, ITALY, NETHERLANDS, DENMARK, BELGIUM, SPAIN, IRELAND, NORTHERN-IRELAND, USA, CANADA, JAPAN, MEXICO, SOUTH-AFRICA, HUNGARY, AUSTRALIA, NORWAY, SWEDEN, TAMBOV-RUSSIA, ICELAND, ARGENTINA, FINLAND, SOUTH-KOREA, POLAND, SWITZERLAND, PUERTO-RICO, BRAZIL, NIGERIA, CHILE, BELARUS, INDIA, CZECH (REPUBLIC), EAST-GERMANY, SLOVENIA, BULGARIA, ROMANIA, PAKISTAN, CHINA, TAIWAN, PORTUGAL, AUSTRIA, TURKEY, MOSCOW-1990, LITHUANIA, LATVIA, ESTONIA, UKRAINE, RUSSIA, PERU, VENEZUELA, URUGUAY, GHANA, PHILIPPINES, MOLDOVA, GEORGIA, ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN, DOMINICAN-REPUBLIC, BANGLADESH, COLOMBIA, BASQUE (COUNTRY), ANDALUSIA, GALICIA, VALENCIA, SERBIA, MONTENEGRO, MACEDONIA, CROATIA, SLOVAKIA, BOSNIA

Geographic Coverage:

nation  (link)

Geographic Unit(s):

nation  (link)

Unit of Analysis:

individuals

Universe:

Adults 18 and over in the mass publics of 60 societies representing more than 50 different countries around the world.

Kind of Data:

survey data

Notes:

The 1981-1983 wave included surveys in Northern Ireland and the Tambov oblast of the Russian republic; the 1990-1993 wave included surveys in Northern Ireland and Greater Moscow; the 1995-1997 wave included surveys in Puerto Rico, Tambov oblast, Montenegro, and the Andalusian, Basque, Galician and Valencian regions of Spain.

Methodology and Processing

Time Method:

time series

Data Collector:

1981-1984: Argentina 1984 Gallup-Argentina

1981-1984: Australia 1981 Roy Morgan (Gallup)

1981-1984: Belgium 1981 Dimarso

1981-1984: Canada 1981 Gallup-Canada

1981-1984: Denmark 1981 Observa SA

1981-1984: Japan 1981 Nippon Research Center

1981-1984: Finland 1981 Suomen Gallup (Gallup-Finland)

1981-1984: France 1981 Faits et Opinions

1981-1984: West Germany 1981 Institut fuer Demoskopie

1981-1984: Great Britain 1981 Social Surveys (Gallup)

1981-1984: Hungary 1982 Hungarian Academy of Sciences

1981-1984: Iceland 1981 University of Iceland

1981-1984: Ireland 1981 Irish Marketing Surveys

1981-1984: Italy 1981 DOXA

1981-1984: Mexico 1981 IMOP (Gallup-Mexico)

1981-1984: Netherlands 1981 NIPO

1981-1984: Northern Ireland 1981 Irish Marketing Surveys

1981-1984: Norway 1982 Central Bureau of Statistics

1981-1984: South Africa 1982 Markinor

1981-1984: South Korea 1982 Gallup

1981-1984: Spain 1981 DATA SA

1981-1984: Sweden 1982 Gallup-Sweden

1981-1984: Tambov oblast 1982 USSR Academy of Sciences

1981-1984: United States 1982 The Gallup Organization

1990-1993: ARGENTINA--Instituto Gallup de la Argentina (Buenos Aires) February-April, 1991

1990-1993: AUSTRIA--Fessel + GFK Institut (Vienna) ; June-July, 1990

1990-1993: BELARUS--Institute of Sociology, Belarus Academy of Sciences (Minsk); October-November, 1990.

1990-1993: BELGIUM -- Dimarso-Gallup, Belgium (Brussels); June, 1990

1990-1993: BRAZIL--Instituto Gallup de Opiniao Publica (Sao Paolo) ; October, 1991-January, 1992

1990-1993: BRITAIN -- Gallup (London) ; June-September, 1990.

1990-1993: BULGARIA--National Public Opinion Center (Sofia); August, 1990

1990-1993: CANADA -- Gallup-Canada (Toronto) ; May-June, 1990

1990-1993: CHILE --Centro de Estudios de la Realidad Contemporanea (Santiago) ; May, 1990.

1990-1993: CHINA--China Statistical Information Center (Beijing), ; July-December, 1990

1990-1993: CZECHOSLOVAKIA -- Association for Independent Social Analysis (Prague); September, 1990

1990-1993: DENMARK --Socialforskningsinstituttet (Danish National Institute of Social Research),(Copenhagen); April-May, 1990

1990-1993: ESTONIA--Mass Communication Research and Information Center (Tallinn); June-August, 1990

1990-1993:FINLAND --Suomen Gallup [Gallup-Finland] (Helskinki) N=588; April, 1990.

1990-1993: FRANCE -- Faits et Opinions (Paris); June-July, 1990

1990-1993: (EAST) GERMANY -- Institut fuer Demoskopie (Allensbach) ; Fall, 1990.

1990-1993: (WEST) GERMANY -- Institut fuer Demoskopie (Allensbach) ; June-July, 1990

1990-1993: HUNGARY--Gallup, Hungary (Budapest); May-June, 1990

1990-1993: ICELAND --University of Iceland, Social Science Research Institute,; April, 1990.

1990-1993: INDIA--Indian Institute of Public Opinion (New Delhi) ; July-December, 1990.

1990-1993: IRELAND -- Economic and Social Research Institute (Dublin) ; July-October, 1990

1990-1993: NORTHERN-IRELAND ; July-September, 1990.

1990-1993: ITALY -- Centro internazionale di recerche sociali sulle aree montane (Trento) ; October-November, 1990.

1990-1993: JAPAN -- Nippon Research Center Ltd. [Gallup-Japan] (Tokyo) ; September, 1990

1990-1993: SOUTH KOREA -- Ewha University (Seoul) ; June-July, 1990.

1990-1993: LATVIA--Public Opinion Research Group, Latvian Sociological Association (Riga) ; June-August, 1990

1990-1993: LITHUANIA-- Vilnius State University Sociological Laboratory (Vilnius); June-August, 1990.

1990-1993: MEXICO -- Market and Opinion Research International [MORI de Mexico] (Mexico City); May, 1990.

1990-1993: MOSCOW--Institute of Sociology, Soviet Academy of Sciences (Moscow); October-November, 1990

1990-1993: NETHERLANDS -- Institut voor Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Tilburg); June-August, 1990.

1990-1993: NIGERIA -- Research and Marketing Services, Ltd. [Gallup-Nigeria] (Lagos) ; May-June, 1990

1990-1993: NORWAY --survey division of Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics (Oslo); April-June, 1990

1990-1993: POLAND -- Osrodek Badania Opinii Publicznej [survey unit of Polish Radio-Television] (Warsaw) ; November-December, 1989.

1990-1993: PORTUGAL -- EuroExpansao, S.A. (Lisbon); May-July, 1990.

1990-1993: RUSSIA--Institute for Social and Political Research, Soviet Academy of Sciences (Moscow) ; January, 1991

1990-1993: ROMANIA--Institute for Research on Quality of Life, Romanian Academy of Sciences (Bucharest); Spring, 1993

1990-1993: SLOVENIA--Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Ljubljana ; February, 1992

1990-1993: SOUTH AFRICA--Markinor (Johannesburg); October-November, 1990.

1990-1993: SPAIN--DATA, Madrid ; April-May, 1990

1990-1993: SPAIN -- Analisis Sociologicas, Economicos Y Politicos (ASEP) Madrid. ; May, 1990

1990-1993: SWEDEN --Svenska Institutet for Opinionsundersokingar (SIFO)[Gallup-Sweden] (Stockholm); April-May, 1990

1990-1993: SWITZERLAND--ISOPUBLIC, Institut Suisse d'Opinion Publique (Zurich); November 1988-February, 1989

1990-1993: TURKEY-- Bogazici University, Department of Political Science (Istanbul); November, 1990 - January, 1991.

1990-1993: U.S.A.-- The Gallup Organization (Princeton); May-June, 1990.

1995-1997: ARGENTINA--Instituto Gallup de la Argentina (Buenos Aires); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: ARMENIA--Sociological Research Center, Armenian Academy of Sciences (Yerevan). February, 1997.

1995-1997: AUSTRALIA--Roy Morgan Research Center (Melbourne); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: AZERBAIJAN-SIAR (Baku); Nov, 1996. .

1995-1997: BANGLADESH--Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad (BUP) (Dhaka); August, 1996.

1995-1997: BELARUS--NOVAK Institute (Minsk); December, 1996.

1995-1997: BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA- Ivan Hartjiisky Institute for Social Values and Structures (Sofia, Bulgaria), April, 1998.

1995-1997: BRAZIL--Instituto Gallup de Opiniao Publico (Sao Paulo); Fall, 1997.

1995-1997: BRITAIN--MORI (London); March, 1998.

1995-1997: BULGARIA-Ivan Hartijiisky Institute for Social Values and Structures [BBSS Gallup International] (Sofia); December, 1997.

1995-1997: CHILE--CERC (Santiago); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: CHINA--Gallup-China (Beijing); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: COLOMBIA--Centro Nacional de Consultoria (Bogota), 1997 and april 1998.

CROATIA--Institute for the Culture of Democracy, Erasmus Guild (Zagreb); December, 1995.

1995-1997: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Centro POVEDA (Santo Domingo); April, 1996.

1995-1997: EAST GERMANY--FORSA (Berlin); March, 1997.

1995-1997: ESTONIA--Center for Social Studies in Eastern Europe (Tallinn). Oct-Nov, 1996.

1995-1997: FINLAND--Suomen Gallup (Espoo); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: GEORGIA--Georgian Institute of Public Opinion, (Tbilisi); December, 1996.

1995-1997: GHANA-- Research and Marketing Services, Ltd. (Lagos); October, 1995.

1995-1997: INDIA--OASES (New Delhi); 1995-1996.

1995-1997: JAPAN--Nippon Research Center (Tokyo); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997:LATVIA--Foundation for the Advancement of Sociological Studies; Oct-Nov, 1996.

1995-1997: LITHUANIA--Baltic Surveys (Vilnius); Oct-Nov, 1996.

1995-1997: MACEDONIA-Ivan Hartjiisky Institute for Social Values and Structures (Sofia, Bulgaria); December, 1997.

1995-1997: MEXICO--MORI de Mexico and Reforma (Mexico City); Fall, 1995 and Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: MOLDOVA-Institute of Sociology, Moldovan Academy of Sciences (Chisinau), December, 1996.

1995-1997: MONTENEGRO--Institute of Social Sciences, University of Belgrade (Belgrade). October, 1996.

1995-1997: NIGERIA--Research and Marketing Services, Ltd. (Lagos); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: NORWAY--Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics; Fall, 1996.

1995-1997: PAKISTAN-Department of Rural Sociology, University of Agriculture (Faisalabad); March-September, 1997.

1995-1997: PERU-- Gerente de Apoyo, S.A. (Lima); May, 1996.

1995-1997: PHILIPPINES -- Social Weather Stations (Quezon City); March-April 1996.

1995-1997: POLAND--Centrum Badania Opinii Spolecznej (Warsaw); January-February, 1997.

1995-1997: PUERTO RICO--College of Social Science, University of Puerto Rico (Rio Piedras); Fall 1995.

1995-1997: RUSSIA-Russian Public Opinion and Market Research [ROMIR] (Moscow); November-December, 1995.

1995-1997: SERBIA--Institute of Social Sciences, University of Belgrade (Belgrade). October, 1996.

1995-1997: SLOVENIA--Survey Research Center, University of Ljubjana (Ljubjana); September-November, 1995. .

1995-1997: SOUTH AFRICA--Markinor (Stellenbosch); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: SOUTH KOREA--Ewah Women's University (Seoul) and Seoul National University; Spring 1996.

1995-1997: SPAIN--ASEP (Madrid); October, 1995.

1995-1997: ANDALUCIA- Instituto Andaluz de Estadistica (Malaga). March, 1996.

1995-1997: BASQUE COUNTRY- Facultad de Ciencias Politicas y Sociologia, Universidad de Deusto (Bilbao). May-June 1995.

1995-1997: GALICIA-Facultad de Sociologia, Universidad de la Coruna (La Coruna). November, 1995.

1995-1997: VALENCIA-Departamento de Sociologia, Universidad de Valencia (Valencia). October, 1995.

1995-1997: SWEDEN--TEMO (Solna); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: SWITZERLAND--Geselleschaft fuer Socialforschung (XX); Fall, 1996.

1995-1997: TAMBOV-- ROMIR (Moscow); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: TAIWAN--Survey Research Center, Academia Sinica (Taipei); summer, 1994 and summer1995.

1995-1997: TURKEY-Survey Research Center, Bogazici University (Istanbul); December, 1996-January, 1997.

1995-1997: UKRAINE--Social Monitoring Center, National Institute for Strategic Studies (Kiev); September, 1996.

1995-1997: URUGUAY--Equipos Consultores Associados (Montevideo). October, 1996.

1995-1997: U.S.A.-- The Gallup Organization (Princeton) Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: VENEZUELA--DOXA (Caracas); March-April, 1996.

1995-1997: WEST GERMANY-FORSA (Berlin); March-April, 1997.

Frequency of Data Collection:

Three waves of surveys were completed in 1981-1984, 1990-1993 and 1995-1997; a fourth wave is being carried out in 1999-2000.

Sampling Procedure:

Both national random and quota sampling were used. The populations of India, China, and Nigeria, as well as rural areas and the illiterate population, were undersampled.;

All surveys were carried out with a sampling universe consisting of all adult citizens, ages 18 and older. In most cases, stratified multi-stage random sampling was used, with the samples being selected in two stages. First, a random selection of sampling locations was made ensuring that all types of location were represented in proportion to their population. Next, a random selection of individuals was drawn up. In some countries, individuals were selected from electoral rolls or from a central registry of citizens. In Norway, and Sweden, stratified random samples were interviewed. The U.S. and Canada used stratified random samples, with three call backs. The Japanese used a stratified multi-stage random sample, drawing names from records maintained by local government agencies. Most other countries used multi-stage random sampling to select the household, with given individuals in the household being selected using a Kish grid to select the person to be interviewd from a listing of all those in the household. In some countries, the final selection was made by quota sampling with quotas assigned on the basis of sex, age, occupation and region, using census data as a guide to the distribution of each group in the population. The Chinese survey used stratified multi-stage random sampling, first stratifying the provinces according to three levels of economic development, with several provinces being randomly selected within each of these strata. In the usual sampling design, within each country, a multi-stage, random selection of sampling points is carried out, with a number of points being drawn from all administrative regional units after stratification by region and degree of urbanization. In each sampling point a starting address is drawn at random. Further addresses are selected by random route procedures. All interviews are carried out face-to-face at home, in the respective national languages. National samples were used in all but the following cases: sub-national surveys were carried out in Northern Ireland and the greater Moscow region (which was surveyed in 1990 in addition to the entire Russian republic). In 1981 when it was not possible to survey the entire Russian republic, a survey was carried out in Tambov oblast of the Russian republic. Tambov oblast was surveyed again in 1995, to permit time-series comparisons; we interviewed a representative Russian national sample of 2,040 in addition to the subsample of 500 persons in the Tambov region. In 1995, regional surveys were carried out in the Andalusian, Basque, Galician and Valencian regions of Spain, in addition to the Spanish national survey. Puerto Rico was also surveyed in 1995. In Chile, the sample covers the central portion of the country, which contains 63% of the total population; the income level of this region is about 40% higher than the national average. In Argentina, sampling was limited to the urbanized central portion of the country, where about 70 per cent of the population is concentrated, and which also has above-average incomes. Within this region, 200 sampling points were selected, with approximately five individuals being interviewed in each sampling point through multi-stage probability sampling moving through zones, sections and dwellings to individuals. In India, in both 1990 and 1995, the sample was stratified to allocate 90% of the interviews to urban areas and 10% to rural areas; and to have 90% of the respondents with literate respondents (who are slightly less than 50% of the population). The interviews were distributed among 16 states in proportion to their population. This sample was stratified to be representative of age, sex and region, but overrepresents urban and literate respondents: only ten percent of these interviews was carried out in rural areas, as was the case with the 1990 survey. Weighting is necessary to approximate national population parameters. In Nigeria, in 1990 the fieldwork was limited to urban areas plus a sample of rural areas within 100 kilometers of an urban center. In Nigeria, national samples of the adult population were interviewed, in all 30 states in proportion to their population. The interviews were carried out in the respective languages of the given region, and were stratified to be 40 percent urban and 60 per cent rural. In the 1995 Nigerian survey, in the South, rural areas were randomly selected from a list of rural settlements within a 10 kilometer radius of the selected urban towns; in the North they were selected from within a 50 kilometer radius of the selected towns In China the sample is 90 per cent urban and largely excludes the illiterate population. In both 1981 and 1990, the samples from both the United States and South Africa were stratified by race, overrepresenting minority races. The weight variable corrects for this. The Swiss surveys are stratified by language group, producing a sample that overrepresents the French-speaking and Italian-speaking groups; to obtain a nationally representative sample, the weight variable should be used. In Russia, the individual respondent were selected from centralized lists of the place of residence of everyone living in the jurisdiction of a particular state-run address bureau. Because of communal living arrangments, this has some advantages over a within-household random selection. The weight variable also corrects for obvious deviations from national population parameters in age and education in other countries. In the 1981 surveys, for example, it compensates for the fact that the 18-24 year old age group was oversampled by a factor of roughly two. In most cases, the more highly educated are oversampled, and are accordingly weighted less heavily than the less educated. ADDITIONAL NOTES FROM 1990 SURVEYS: In Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Italy and the Republic of Ireland, individuals were selected from electoral rolls; in Slovenia they were selected from a central registry of citizens. In Norway, Sweden and Denmark, stratified random samples were interviewed, with response rates averaging 71%. The U.S. and Canada used stratified random samples, with three call backs. The Japanese used a stratified multi-stage random sample, drawing names from records maintained by local government agencies; completed interviews were obtained with 62 per cent of the individuals drawn. The 1990 Chinese survey used stratified multi-stage random sampling, first stratifying the provinces according to three levels of economic development, with several provinces being randomly selected within each of these strata. Within each province, approximately 20 sampling points were selected randomly, with five individuals being interviewed at each point. The population was stratified according to rural-urban residence, sex, age, occupation and education, and within these sampling points, each stratum was sampled by quota, with a 10 per cent subsample of illiterate persons. The 1990 Indian survey was stratified to cover 14 states representing different geographic and socioeconomic regions of the country, with 2,500 interviews distributed among these states in proportion to their population. Within these 14 states, about 10 per cent of the Parliamentary Constituencies were selected and 50 interviews allocated to each one. The interviews were then stratified according to town size, allocating 90 per cent to urban areas, but stratifying according to population within the urban sample. A quota sample was then designed which is representative in terms of age and sex, but not education, since the sample design called for 90% of the interviews to be carried out with the literate part of the public. Within this segment, interviews were stratified according to education. Interviews were carried out in the eight most widely-spoken langugages of India, but the rural 10 per cent of the sample was confined to the five Hindi-speaking states in the sample. The 1990 Nigerian sample was stratified in a similar fashion, with 90 per cent of the interviews being carried out with the urban and literate segments of the population. It was then stratified by age, sex and education, within 17 provinces representing the major ethnic groups in the country. Most surveys in these countries undersample rural and illiterate respondents, who tend to give large numbers of "don't know" responses.

Major Deviations from the Sample Design:

One consequence of the strategy of striving for inclusiveness has been that the quality of fieldwork varies cross-nationally. Like most aspects of human endeavor, performance tends to improve with experience. Moreover, the logistical difficulties involved in interviewing a representative national sample of the population of such countries as China, Peru or Nigeria are far greater than they are in richer and more urbanized countries such as Sweden, the United States or Japan.For these reasons, the quality of our samples tends to be higher in advanced industrial societies that have been conducting representative national samples for several decades, than in countries in which survey research is new. In a number of the societies included in this project, survey research has only recently become possible, and in some cases the World Values Survey was the first representative national survey ever carried out in that country. Our strategy has been to recruit the some of best social scientists in the given country, and to carry out the survey using the best available sampling techniques, rather than to wait until optimal conditions are present-which would mean limiting the project mainly to economically developed societies. With substantially greater funding, it would be possible to have the best of both worlds, carrying out fully random probability samples throughout the world. We believe that this would be a worthwhile allocation of resources, and hope that it will be possible in the future. For the present, we have striven for global inclusiveness using available resources. We have analyzed these data extensively, and where possible, have compared the results with those from other surveys. The results leave little doubt in our minds that, even with the societies where survey techniques are new, the findings are generally reliable.The surveys from most low income countries undersample the illiterate portion of the public and oversample the urban areas and the more educated strata. The present dataset is weighted to correct for these and other features of sampling; but it would be unrealistic to view the samples from the low income countries as fully comparable to those from advanced industrial societies. Because of these factors, it is advisable to use the weight variable (V236) in most analyses. Our analyses indicate that the more educated and more urbanized oversampled groups within low-income countries tend to have orientations relatively similar to those found in the publics of industrial societies. This means that our data tend to underestimate the size of cross-national differences involving these countries; nevertheless, we consistently find sizeable differences between the prevailing values of rich and poor societies.

Mode of Data Collection:

face-to-face interviews

Type of Research Instrument:

structured

Weighting:

The present data set is weighted to correct for undersampling of the illiterate portion of the public and oversampling of the urban areas and more educated strata, as well as for other obvious deviations from national population parameters.  (link)

Cleaning Operations:

Missing data codes were standardized by data producer/principal investigator.

Cleaning Operations:

Checks for undocumented codes performed by ICPSR.

Cleaning Operations:

Data reformatted by ICPSR

Cleaning Operations:

In the data for 1981-1984 and 1990-1993, the wild codes were changed to undocumented codes.

Notes:

The Principal Investigators were unable to collect documentation for all of the code values which appear in the nation-specific variables. Some of these values are labeled as "documentation not available" or "undocumented code" in the codebook. Users should note that some code values are not included in the codebook and others have no cases in the data file.

Response Rate:

Most of the participating institutes did not report response rates. Using a probability sample, the Slovenian group reports an impressive 87% response rate. The highest rate was reported by the Czech group, which drew a 1990 quota sample of 1,450 interviews stratified by sex, age, education, region and size of community, within 303 randomly selected sampling points; they obtained 1,396 completed interviews, for a remarkably high response rate of 96%. The 1990 Romanian survey used a pure quota sample, stratified by age, sex, occupation, and size of the community within each of nine regions of the country. They report that, despite the lengthy interview, the number of those who refused to be interviewed was very small.

Data Access

Location:

Ann Arbor, Mi.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Extent of Collection:

1 data file + machine-readable documentation (PDF) + SAS data definition statements + SPSS data definition statements;

Number of Files:

4 files

Citation Requirement:

Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, AND 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR Version. Ann Arbor, Mi.: Institute for Social Research [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000.

Deposit Requirement:

To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Please indicate in a cover letter which data were used.

Disclaimer:

The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Paul Abramson and Ronald Inglehart, Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.

Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Citation

Title:

Max Kaase and Kenneth Newton, Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1995.

Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1996.

Ronald Inglehart, Neil Nevitte and Miguel Basanez. Cultural Change in North America? Closer Economic, Political and Cultural Ties between the United States, Canada and Mexico. Hawthorne, N.Y: Aldine de Gruyter, 1996.

Neil Nevitte, The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-National Perspective. Petersborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 1996.

Ronald Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

Joseph S. Nye, Philip D. Zelikow and David C. King (eds.) Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.

Ronald Inglehart, Miguel Basanez and Alejandro Moreno, Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.

Pippa Norris, (ed.) Critical Citizens: Support for Democratic Government, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Mark Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Ed Diener and Mark Suh (eds.) Subjective Well-Being in Global Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.

Abbruzzese, S. 1992. L'Italia dei valori. Micromega 4: 123-32.

Abela, Anthony M. 1992. Transmitting Values in European Malta. A Study in the Contemporary Values of Modern Society. Valletta and Rome: Jesuit Publications/Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana.

Abela, Anthony M. 1992. European values study in Malta. Melita Theologica, University of Malta, XLIII: 33-38.

Abela, Anthony M. 1993. Post-secularisation: The social significance of religious values in four Catholic European countries. Melita Theolgica XLIV: 39-58.

Abela, Anthony M. 1993. Valori per il futuro di Malta. La Civilta Cattolica Quaderno 3429, Roma: 260-69.

Abela, Anthony M. 1994. Values for Malta's future. Social change, values and social policy. In R.G. Sultana and G. Baldacchino (eds.), Maltese Society. A Sociological Inquiry. Malta: Mireva Publications.

Abela, Anthony M. 1995. Youth and Religion in Malta. Social Compass 42: 59-67.

Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1994. Education, security, and postmaterialism. American Journal of Political Science 38, 3.

Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1994. Generational change: Cohort effects and period effects. In Henk Becker and Piet Hermkens (eds.) Solidarity of Generations: Demographics, Economic and Social Change and its Consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis, 1994, pp. 71-109

. Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Aish-Van Vaerenbergh, Ann-Marie, and Jacques-Rene Rabier. 1994. Algunas reflexiones metodologicas sobre la investigacion estadistica intercultural sobre los valores. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Akker, Piet van den, and Sheena Ashford. 1995. Individualism in contemporary Europe. The case of Eastern Europe. in Ruud de Moor (ed.), Values in Western Society. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Akker, Piet van den, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Primary relations in Western societies. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Alishauskene, Rasa. 1994. El humor politica en la poblacion lituana. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Ashford, A., and Loek Halman. 1994. Changing attitudes in the European community. In C. Rootes and H. Davies (eds.), Social Change and Political Transformation, pp. 72-85. London: UCL Press.

Ashford, Sheena, and Noel Timms. 1992. What Europe Thinks: A Study of Western European Values. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co.

Auh, Soo Young. 1991. The impact of value change on democratization in South Korea. Korean Political Science Review 25, 2. [In Korean]

Auh, Soo Young. 1994. Cambio de valores y democratizacion en Corea del Sur. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Barker, David. 1992. Changing social values in Europe. Business Ethics. A European Review 1: 91-103. Barker, David. 1993. Values and volunteering. In Justin Davis-Smith, Volunteering in Europe. Berkhamsted: The Volunteer Centre.

Barker, D., L. Halman, and A. Vloet. 1992. The European Values Study 1981-1990. Summary Report. London: The Gordon Cook Foundation.

Basanez, Miguel. 1993. Is Mexico Headed Toward its Fifth Crisis? in Riordan Roett (ed.) Political and Economic Liberalizatin in Mexico. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Basanez, Miguel. 1993. "Protestant and Catholic Ethics: An Empirical Comparison," paper presented at conference on Changing Social and Political Values: A Global Perspective, Complutense University, Madrid, September 27-October 1.

Basanez, Miguel. 1994. Winners and Losers of NAFTA in Mexico. in Brenda M. McPhail (ed.) NAFTA Now! The Changing Political Economy of North America. Latham, MD: University Press of America.

Basanez, Miguel, and Alejandro Moreno. 1994. Mexico en la Encuesta Mundial de Valores 1981-1990. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Bashkirova, Elena. 1994. Cambio de actitudes politicas y los valores en la URSS y Russia. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Becker, Henk. 1995. Generations and Value Change. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Brechon, Pierre. 1995. Les Europeens et la politique. Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 63-84.

Brechon, Pierre. (1997). Religions et politique en Europe. Paris.

Breen, G., and C.T. Whelan. 1993. Social class, class origins and political partisanship in the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Political Research 25.

Broek, Andries van den, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Eastern Europe after 1989. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Broek, Andries van den, and Felix Heunks. 1993. Political culture. Patterns of political orientations and behavior. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Broek, Andries van den. 1997. "Cohort Replacelment and Generation Formation in Western Polities." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Capraro, G. 1992. I valori degli Italiani nel contesto Europeo. Presbyteri XXVI 9: 679-702.

Capraro, G. 1992. I valori degli Italiani negli anni Ottanta secondo un'indagine Europea. Pp. 197-207 in CET, Le regioni del Nord-Est, Societa, economia e ambiente. Padova: Messaggero.

Capraro, G. 1993. Valori Europei e loro trasmissione in un-Europa aperta. In AA.VV. Anziani e Cultura Europea. Atti del Convegno Naziale della Federuni Trento. Vicenza: Rezzara.

Capraro, G. 1993. Sociologia e religione: teoria e ricerca empirica. Brescia: Morcelliana.

Capraro, G., and R. Gubert. 1993. I valori degli Europei. Trento: Regione Autonoma Trentino-Alta Adige.

Carballo de Cilley, Marita, and Carlos Matheus. 1994. Actitudes y valores politicos y laborales: comparacion entre Brasil y Argentina. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Chauvel, Louis. 1993. Les valeurs dans la Communaute Europeenne: l'erosion des extremismes. Observations et Diagnostics Economiques, Revue de l'OPCE.

Chauvel, Louis. 1995. Valeurs regionales et nationales en Europe. Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 167-200.

Chiu, Hei Yuan. 1994. Valores de la educacion en la sociedad Taiwanesa. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Clarke, Harold D., Allan Kornberg, Chris McIntyre, Petra Bauer, and Max Kaase. 1999. "The Impact of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change: New Experimental Evidence." American Political Science Review 93 (September).

Conci, A. 1993. I valori degli Europei fra evoluzione e nostalgia. Rivista di Teologia Morale XXV 1: 55-72.

Dalton, Russell J. 1993. Politics in Germany, 2nd edition. New York: Harper Collins.

Dalton, Russell J. 1994. The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dalton, Russell J. . A Crisis of Confidence in Advanced Industrial Societies? in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Davie, G. 1992. God and Caesar: Religion in a Rapidly Changing Europe. in J. Bailey (ed.) Social Europe. London and New York: Longman.

Davis, Darren W., and Christian Davenport. 1999. "Assessing the Validity of Postmaterialism." American Political Science Review 93 (September).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Human Studies No. 7 "Fairness," semi-annual report by Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (in Japanese and English).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Human Studies No. 9 "Sense of Values," semi-annual report by Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (in Japanese and English).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Human Studies No. 11 "A New Course for the U.S.; A New Direction for Japan," semi-annual report by Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (in Japanese and English).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Nihon No Chouryuu (Japanese Trends) -- Quality of Society (in Japanese). PHP-Kennkyuusho Publishing Company.

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. 1997. Ibunnka Tositeno Nihon to Amerika. Tokyo: Nannundou Publishing Company.

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. 1998. Ibunnka Likai to Ibunnka Masatsu. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinnbunnsha.

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies and The Leisure Development Center of Japan. 1994. Japon en una perspectiva comparativa. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco

Dekker, Paul and Andries van den Broek. 1997. "Volunteering and Politics: Involvement in Voluntary Associations from a 'Civic Culture' Perspective." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Diez Medrano, Juan . 1994. El significado de los concepios de izquierda y de derecha: una perspectiva comparada. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Diez Medrano, Juan. 1997. "Does Western Europe Stop at the Pyrenees?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Diez Nicolas, Juan. 1994. Postmaterialismo y desarollo economico. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Dobbelaere, Karel. 1993. Church involvement and secularization: Making sense of the European case. In. E. Barker, J.A. Beckford, and K Dobbelaere (eds.), Secularization, Rationalism and Sectarism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dobbelaere, Karel, and Wolfgang Jagodzinski. 1995. Religious cognitions and beliefs. In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Dobbelaere, Karel. 1995. Religion in Europe and North America. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Dogan, Mattei. 1994. The decline of nationalism within Western Europe. Comparative Politics, April: 281-305.

Dogan, Mattei. 1994. The erosion of Nationalism in the European Community. in M. Haller and R. Richter (eds.) Towards a European Nation? New York: Sharpe: 31-54.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. The decline of Class Voting and of Religious Vote in Western Europe. International Social Science Journal, 146: 525-538.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. Le Declin des Croyances Relgieuses en Europe Occidentale. Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales, 3. 461-476.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. Testing the Concepts of Legitimacy and Trust. in H.E. Chehabi and Alfred Stepan (eds.) Politics, Society and Democracy: Essays in Honor of Juan Linz. Boulder: Westview Press.

Doring, H. 1992. Higher education and confidence in institutions: A secondary analysis of the 'European Values Survey', 1981-83. West European Politics 15: 126-46.

Duch, Raymond M., and Michael A. Taylor. 1994. A reply to 'Education, security, and postmaterialism.' American Journal of Political Science 38:xxx-xxx.

Elzo, Javier. 1994. Nacionalismo, nacionalidad y religion en Euskalerria. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Elzo, Javier, F.A. Orizo, M.A. Barreda, F. Garmendia, P.G. Blasco, and J.F. Santacoloma. 1992. Euskalerria ante la Encuesta Europea de Valores. Son Los Vascos Diferentas? Bilbao: Universidad De Deusto Deiker. Elzo, Javier, et al. 1991. Construir Europa: Euskadi. Editorial Areces.

Elzo, Javier, et al. 1992. Drogas y Escuela IV. Escuela Universitaria de Trabajo Social. San Sebastian. Elzo, Javier, et al. 1992. Euskadi ante las Drogas 92. Informe sobre la evolucion del consumo de tasbaco, alcohol y demas drogas en los ultimos diez anos. Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.

Elzo, Javier, et al. 1993. Giovani e religione in Spagna. In Luigi Tomasi (ed.), Persistenze Valiorioli e Nuovi Orientananti. Trento: Reverdito Edizioni.

Elzo, Javier, et al. 1994. Jovenes espanoles. Editorial S.M. Madrid. Ester, Peter, and Loek Halman. Forthcoming. Empirical trends in religious and moral beliefs in Western Europe. A cross-sectional longitudinal analysis: 1981-1990. In M. Haller and R. Richter (eds.), Towards a European Nation? Political Trends in Europe. New York: Sharpe.

Ester, Peter, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Value shift in western societies. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Ester, Peter, Loek Halman, and Brigitte Seuren. 1993. Environmental concern in Europe and North America. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Ester, Peter, Loek Halman, and H. Vinken. 1992. Zur diffusion und kristallisation von wertorientierungen in der Niederlandischen Bevolkerung. H.H. Medien, Medienwissenschaftliche Beitrage der Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf, Heft 2/3 December: 36-59.

Franca, Luis de. 1993. Portugal, valores Europeus, identidade cultural. Lisbon: Instituto de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento.

Fuchs, Dieter. Germany: East and West. in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Fuchs, Dieter, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1995. Citizens and the state: A changing relationship? In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Gabriel, Oscar W. 1995. "Political Efficacy and Trust," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gabriel, Oscar W. "Distrust, Involvement and Political Protest in Western Democracies." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Galland, Olivier and Yannick Lemel. 1995. "La Permanence des differences: une comparison des systemes de valeurs entre pays europeens." Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 113-130/

Gibbins, John and Bo Reimer. 1995. "Postmodernism," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gold, H., and A. Webster. 1990. New Zealand Values Today. Palmerston North: Alpha.

Granato, Jim, Ronald Inglehart and David Leblang. 1996a. "The Effect of Culture on Economic Development: Theory, Hypotheses and Some Empirical Tests." American Journal of Political Science 40,3: 607-31.

Granato, Jim, Ronald Inglehart and David Leblang. 1996b. "Cultural Values, Stable Democracy and Economic Development: A Reply." American Journal of Political Science 40,3: 680-96.

Gubert, Renzo (ed.). 1992. Persitenze e mutamenti dei Valori degli Italinan nel Contesto Europea. Trento: Reverdito Edizioni.

Gubert, Renzo. 1995. Analysis of Regional Differences in the Values of European. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Gundelach, Peter, and Ole Riis. 1993. Danskernes Voerdier. Kobenhavn K.: Forlaget Sociologi.

Gundelach, Peter, and Ole Riis. 1994. El retorno al familismo? In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Gundelach, Peter. 1994. National Value Differences" Modernization or Institutionalization? International Journal of Comparative Studies. 35: 37-58.

Gundelach, Peter and Svend Kreiner. 1997. "Individualization or Neo-Conservatism?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek. 1992. Culturele identiteit: Waardevol of waardeloos? Rawoo Lunchlezing 28, April.

Halman, Loek. 1994. Westerse waarden. Wat weten wij van onze cultuur? In M. Veldhuis, Cultuur en Ontwikkeling. Rawoo Lezingenserie 1992. Den Haag: Rawoo.

Halman, Loek. 1995. La comparazione dei valori nell'European Value Study. La misurazione dei valori e il problema della comparabilita. In R. Gubert and G. Capraro (eds.), I Valori degli Eurpei negli anni Novanta. Trento: University of Trento.

Halman, Loek. 1994. Scandinavian values. How special are they? In Thorleif Pettersson and Ole Riis (eds.), Religious and Moral Values in Scandinavian Countries. Stockholm: Almqvist Wiksell International.

Halman, Loek. Variatoins in Tolerance levels in Europe. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research. 2: 15-38.

Halman, Loek, K. Dobbelaere, R. de Moor, and L. Voye. 1992. Godsdienst en kerk in Belgie en Nederland. Sociologische Gids 92/5-6: 285-99.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Comparative research on values. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Religion, churches and moral values. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Value patterns and modernity. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1994. Individualizacion y cambio de valores en Europa y Norteamerica. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Halman, Loek. 1995. Is there a Moral Decline? A cross-national Inquiry into Morality in Contemporary Society. International Social Science Journal 145:419-440.

Halman, Loek and Neil Nevitte. 1997. "Political Values, Identification , Participation and Value Change" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek and Thorleif Petterson. 1995. Individualization and Value Fragmentation. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek and Thorleif Pettersson. "The Shifting Sources of Moralitiy: From Religion to Post-materialist?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek and Ton Heinen. "Left and Right in Modern Society." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Harding, Stephen D. and Frans J. Hikspoors. 1995. New Work Values: in Theory and in Practice. International Social Science Journal 145: 441-456.

Hardiman, N., and C.T. Whelan. 1994. "Politics and Democratic Values in the Republic of Ireland." in Christopher T. Whelan (ed.) Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Hardiman, N., and C.T. Whelan. 1994. "Values in Political Partisanship." in Christopher T. Whelan (ed.) Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Huenks, Felix and Frans Hikspoors. 1995. Political Culture, 1960-1990. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Huenks, Felix. 1997. "Patterns of Social and Political Integration" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Honne, Sissel. 1994. Rekkefolgeeffekt -- et seigt og magert tema? Om formeffekter i den norske verdiundersokelsen [On Form Effects in the Norweigian Values Survey]. Thesis, Department of Sociology and Political Science, University of Trondheim, 1994

Hornsby-Smith, M.P., and C.T. Whelan. 1994. "Religious and Moral Values in Ireland" in Christo pher T. Whelan (ed.) Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Hornsby-Smith, M.P. and M. Procter. 1995. Catholic Identity, Religious Context and Environmental Values in Western Europe. Social Compass 42: 27-34.

Huseby, Beate and Ola Listhaug. 1995. Identifications of Norwegians with Europe: The Impact of Values and Center-Periphery Factors. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. Changing values in industrial societies: The case of North America, 1981-1990. Politics and the Individual 2, 2:1-31.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. Vergleichende wertewandelforschung (revised 2nd edition). In Ferdinand Müeller-Rommel and Dirk Berg-Schlosser (eds.), Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (Leverkusen: Leske Verlag) 125-44.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1993. Democratizacao em perspectiva global. Opinao Publica (July-August):9-42. Inglehart, Ronald. 1993. Modernizacion y post-modernizacion: la cambiante relacion entre el desarrollo economico, cambio cultural y politico. In Juan Diez Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.) Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1994. Les valeurs des europeens: Existe-il un systeme des valeurs europeen? Futuribles, November.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Public support for environmental problems: Objective problems and subjective values. PS Political Science and Politics.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Changing Values, Economic Development and Political Change. International Social Science Journal 145: 379-404.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. "Modernization Erodes Respect for Authority but Enhances Support for Democracy." in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. "Trust, Well-Being and Democracy," in Mark Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. "Equivalence in Comparative Research: Comparing Values across Cultures." In Jan Van Deth (ed.) Different but Similar: Establishing Equivalence in International Comparative Research. Oxford, Oxford University.

Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel Basanez and Alejandro Moreno. 1998. Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Inglehart, Ronald, Neil Nevitte and Miguel Basanez. 1996. The North American Trajectory: Cultural, Economic and Political Ties among the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine.

Inglehart, Ronald, and Paul R. Abramson. 1994. Economic security and value change, 1970-1993. American Political Science Review, June:336-54.

Inglehart, Ronald and Paul R. Abramson. 1999. Measuring Postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, September

Inglehart, Ronald, and Rudy Andeweg. 1993. Change in Dutch political culture: A silent or a silenced revolution? West European Politics, July:345-61.

Inglehart, Ronald and Marita Carballo. 1997. "Does Latin America Exist? (And is there a ConfucianCulture?): A Global Analysis of Cross-Cultural Differences. PS: Political Science and Politics. 30, 1: 34-46.

Inglehart, Ronald, and Terry N. Clark. 1991. Nowa Kultura Polityczna (The New Political Culture) (Warsaw). Reprinted in Hungarian as "Az uj politikai kultura," in Gabor Peteri (ed.), Helyi Demokracia es Ujitasok (Reforming Local Democracy) (Budapest: Alapitvany kiadvanya, 1992) 22-96.

Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel Basanez, and Neil Nevitte. 1994. Convergencia en Norteamerica: Comercio, Politica y Cultura. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Karel Dobbelaere. 1993. Die amtskirchen im prozess der modernisierung. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 33: 68-91.

Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Karel Dobbelaere. 1995. Religious and ethical pluralism. In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Karel Dobbelaere. 1995. Secularization and church religiosity. In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Kaase, Max and Kenneth Newton. 1995. Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kalaycioglu, Ersin. 1994. Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey. Comparative Political Studies 27,3: 402-424.

Kerkhofs, Jan 1990. Europa. Waardenontwikkeling of -ontworteling? Ondernemen VKW Brussel, 46: 525-31.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. L'Europe a une nouvelle croisee des chemins; vers une autre echelle de valuers. Lumen Vitae 47: 15-24

. Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Europa heute -aus der sicht der kirchen. Communio 21: 295-304

. Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. A quel point l'Europe est-elle religieuse? Concilium 1992, nr. 240: 97-107.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Waarden-evolutie van jongeren in een postmoderne cultuur. Ethische Perspectieven 2: 3-7.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Mutations des valeurs en Europe. L'Entreprise et l'homme 64: 215-20.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Waardenverschuivingen in Europa en Belgie. Cultuur in Beweging 19, 4: 21-24.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. La problematique familiale selon des recentes etudes sur les valeurs. Cahiers Ceppes, nr. 3: 137-42.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. L'Europe: Une autre echelle de valeurs. Christus, nr. 156, okt.: 499-508.

Kerkhofs, J. 1992. Jongeren en waarden in een postmoderne cultuur. Korrel Cahier, Altiora, Averbode: 5-11.

Kerkhofs, Jan., Karel Dobbelaere, Lilianne Voye, and Bernadette Bawin-Legros (eds.). 1992. De Versnelde Ommekeer. Tielt: Lannoo.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1995. The Convergence of Party Positions and Voter Orientations. In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Dieter Fuchs (eds.) 1995. Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. . Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: Global Trends, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Gurgling Lass, and Katrin Mattusch. 1994. Nationalitatenkonflikt und mechanismen politischer integration im Baltikum. In Dieter Segert (Hrsg.), Konfliktregulierung durch Parteien und Politische Stabilitat in Ostmitteleuropa. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Gurgling Lass, and Katrin Mattusch. 1994. La orientacion de valores y la participacion politica en los Estados Balticos. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Knutsen, Oddbjorn. 1995. "Left-Right Materialist Orientations," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knutsen, Oddbjorn and Elinor Scarbrough. 1995. "Cleavage Politics," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knutsen, Oddbjorn. 1997. "The Impact of Old Politics and New Politics Value Orientations on Party Choice." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Lagos, Marta. . Developments in Transitional Democracis in Latin America, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Lambert, Yves. 1993. Effet d'age, de generation et de periode dans l'evolution religieuse. Revue Francaise de Sociologie.

Lambert, Yves. 1993. Les jeunes et le christianisme: Le grand defi. In Gallimard (ed.), Le Debat.

Lambert, Yves. 1993. Ages, generations et christianisme en France et en Europe. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, XXXIV.

Lambert, Yves. 1994. Les regimes confessionels et l'etat du sentiment religieux. In Jean Bauberot, Religion et Laicite dans l'Europe des Douze. Paris: Syros.

Lambert, Yves, and Guy Michelat. 1992. Crepuscule des religions chez les jeunes? Paris: L'Harmettan.

Lambert, Yves. 1995. Vers une ere post-chretienne? Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 85-112.

Larsen, Max D. 1994. Satisfaccion del consumidor con los servicios gubernamentales. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Laumenskaite, E. 1991. Does Lithuania return to Christian faith. Kataliku Pasaulis 1 [in Lithuanian].

Laumenskaite, E. 1992. The face of religion and its role in the reconstruction of the society in Lithuania. Religion Today, Summer 1992, Vol. 7, No. 3.

Laumenskaite, E. 1993. Religion and the church in Lithuania: The present and the perspectives. Naujasis Zidinys, No. 7-8.

Laumenskaite, E. Forthcoming. Attitudes to family and religion in Lithuania. In Religion, Family and Social Changes. Los Angeles.

Lee, Aie-Rie. 1993. Culture shift and popular protest in South Korea. Comparative Political Studies 26, 1:63-80.

Leschinsky, Achim. 1996. Vorleben oder Nachdenken? Bericht der wissenschaftlischen Begleitung ueber den Modellversuch zum Lernbereich 'Lebensgestaltung-Ethik-Religion' Frankfurt: Verlag Moritz Diesterweg.

Lesthaeghe, Ron, Guy Moors, and Loek Halman. 1992. Living arrangements and values among young adults in the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Germany, 1990. IPD-Working Paper 1992-3, Brussel: Centrum Sociologie, Vrije Universiteit.

Lesthaeghe, Ron and Guy Moore. 1995. Living Arrangements and Parenthood: Do Values Matter? in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Lindseth, Odd Helge. 1993. Samme himmel, samme samfunn? Religion som normregulator blant protestanter og katolikker i Nord-Amerika og Vest-Europa [One Heaven, One Society? Religion as a Regulator of Norms among Protestants and Catholics in North America and Western Europe]. Thesis, Department of Sociology and Political Science, University of Trondheim.

Lindseth, Odd Helge, and Ola Listhaug. 1994. Religion y valores del trabajo en los noventa: un estudio comparativo de Europa Occidental y Estados Unidos. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Lindseth, Odd Helge, and Ola Listhaug. 1994. Religion and work values in the 1990s: A comparative study of Western Europe and North America. In Thorleif Pettersson and Ole Riis (eds.), Religious and Moral Values in the Scandinavian Countries. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.

Listhaug, Ola. 1991. Norske verdier 1982-1990: Stabilitet og endring [Norwegian Values 1982-1990: Stability and Change]. ISS -rapport nr. 30: University of Trondheim.

Listhaug, Ola. 1995 . The impact of modernization and value change on confidence in institutions. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Listhaug, Ola, and Beate Huseby. 1990. Values in Norway 1990: Study description and codebook. ISS -rapport nr. 29: University of Trondheim.

Listhaug, Ola, and Matti Wiberg. 1995. Confidence in political and private institutions. In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State: Changing Public Attitudes toward Government in Western Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Liubsiene, E. 1993. Lithuanian survey of the families raising disabled children. Report for a Regional Seminar for the Baltic States: "The Future of Children with Disabilities in the Baltic States." Vilnius.

Lu, Hai-Qi. 1994. Aproximacion a la posicion de la mujer china en actividades economicas, sociales y politicas. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Magun, Vladimir S. 1997 The Job Values from the Comparative Point of View. (Rossiiskie trudovye cennosti v sravnitel'noi perspective) In: Sociological Readings. Vol.2. Moscow. Open Society Institute; Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Job Values of the Russian Society. (Trudovye cennosti rossiiskogo obcshestva) In: Social Sciences and Modernity, #6.(In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Labor Culture. In: D.Shalin (ed.) Russian Culture at the Crossroads. Paradoxes of Postcommunist Consciousness. Westview Press. (In English)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Job Values of the Russian Population. ( Trudovye cennosti rossiiskogo naselenia) In: Problems of Economics, #1. (In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Activity and Achievement Orientations in the Job Values of Russian People. (Aktivnost' i dostizhitel'nost' v structure trudovyh cennostei rossiiskogo naselenia) In: The Labor-market Development and Social Mobility in Russia. Social-Labor Studies. Vol.4 (In collaboration with Ju.Arzhakova and A.Kryshtanovsky, in Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1995 Job Values of the Russian People: Socialist Model and Postsocialist Reality. (Trudovye cennosti rossiiskogo naselenia: socialisticheskaya model' i postsocialisticheskaya real'nost') In: T.Zaslavskaya (ed). Where is Russia coming?...The Alternatives of Social Development. Vol. II. Moscow (in Russian).

Marques, Guilhermina. 1991. Les valeurs des jeunes Suisses entre 15 et 19 ans. Geneva: Johann Jacobs Foundation.

Mattusch, Katrin. 1994. Demokratisierung und politische kultur im Baltikum. Dissertation: Freie Universitaet Berlin.

Mebs, Kanji and Neil Nevitte. 1997. "Unpacking Environmental Orientations: Deep or Superficial?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Melich, Anna (ed.). 1991. Les Valeurs des Suisses. Berne: Lange Verlag. [German version: Die Werte der Schweizer. Berne: Lang.]

Melich, Anna. 1994. Insatisfacion nacional y desconfianza europea: el caso de Suiza. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Melich, Anna. 1995. National Dissatisfaction and Distrust in Europe: the case of Switzerland. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Montero, Jose Ramon, and Mariano Torcal. 1994. Cambio cultural, reemplazo generacional y politica en Espana. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

de Moor, Ruud. 1995. Religion and Moral Values: The Case of Euthanasia. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Myers, D.G. 1992. The Pursuit of Happiness. New York: William Morrow and Company.

Nas, Masja. 1995. "Green, Greener, Greenest". In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Nevitte, Neil. 1991. New politics, the charter and political participation. In Herman Bakvis (ed.), Representation, Integration and Political Parties in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press. Vol. 14. Report of the Royal Commission on Electoral Change and Party Financing, 1991: 355-417.

Nevitte, Neil. 1994. Se ha vuelto la gente mas tolerante? Evidencias de la Encuesta Mundial de Valores 1981-1990. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference. Toronto: Broadview Press.

Nevitte, Neil. Forthcoming. Bringing values "back in": Value change and North American integration. In D. Barry (ed.), Toward a North American Community? Canada, United States and Mexico. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Nevitte, Neil. Forthcoming. NAFTA: Why not before now? In B. McPhail (ed.), NAFTA Now! The Changing Political Economy of North America. University Press of America.

Nevitte, Neil. 1997. "Tolerance and Intolerance in Advanced Industrial Societies: The Cross-Time Evidence. in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Nevitte, Neil and Herman Bakvis. 1992. The greening of the Canadian electorate: Environmentalism, ideology and partisanship. In Robert Boardman (ed.), Canadian Environmental Policy: Ecosystems, Politics and Process. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

Nevitte, Neil, W. Brandon, and L. Davis. 1993. The American abortion controversy: Lessons from cross-national evidence. Politics and the Life Sciences 12 (1), February: 19-30.

Nevitte, Neil, and Ian Brodie. 1993. Evaluating the citizen's constitution theory. Canadian Journal of Political Science XXVI, June 2: 235-59

. Nevitte, Neil, and Ian Brodie. 1993. Clarifying differences: A rejoinder to Alan Cairn's defence of the citizen's constitution theory. Canadian Journal of Political Science XXVI, June 2: 269-72.

Nevitte, Neil, and Ronald Inglehart. 1992. Directions of value change in North America. In Steven Randall (ed.), North America Without Borders (Calgary: University of Calgary Press) 245-259.

Nevitte, Neil and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. North American Value Change and Integration: Lessons from Western Europe? in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Nevitte, Neil and Mebs Kanji. 1995. "Explaining Environmental Concern and Action in Canada." Applied Behavoral Science Review, 3:1: 85-102.

Nevitte, Neil, and M. Wohlfeld. 1990. Postindustrial value change and support for native issues. Canadian Ethnic Studies 22, 3: 56-88. Newton, Kenneth. . The Impact of Social Trust on Political Support, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999

. Norris, Pippa . The Growth of Critical Citizens? in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Nye, Joseph and Pippa Norris . Conclusions: Strengthening Democratic Government, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Orizo, Francisco Andres. 1991. El Sistema de Valors dels Catalans. Barcelona: Institut Catala d'Etudes Mediterranis.

Orizo, Francisco Andres. 1991. Los Nuevos Valores de los Espanoles. Madrid: Fundacion Santa Maria.

Orizo, Francisco Andres. 1994. Los valores de libertad en Espana. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco

. Orizo, Francisco Andres, and Alejandro Sanchez Fernandez. 1993. El Sistema de Valors dels Catalans. Barcelona: Institut Catala d'Estudis Mediterranis.

Ortiz, Angel I. Rivera, and Jorge Beritez Nazario. 1994. Cambio en valores e identidad nacional: el caso de Puerto Rico desde una perspectiva comparada. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Osti, G. 1993. Dimensioni dell 'insediamento e associazionismo. Annali di Sociologia-Sociologisches Jahrbuch 9: 18. Pettersson, Thorleif. 1994. Individualizacion, secularizacion y cambio de valor moral en la Escandinavia contemporanea. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Purvaneckiene, G. 1993. Individo psichologine busena ir seima. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia 2: 128.

Purvaneckiene, G. 1993. Lietuvos motery vertybines orientacijos keiciantis politinei bei ekonominei padeciai. Visuomene: Politikos, Visuomenes ir Kulturos Zurnalas 1 (22).

Purvaneckiene, G. 1993. Women in changing Lithuania. In Marina Thoberg (ed.), Women Around the Baltic Sea. Part I: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Sweden: Lund University.

Rehak, J. 1992. Are the Czechs and the Slovaks different? Czechoslovak Sociological Review 28: 129-32.

Riffault, Helene. 1993. L'evolution des valeurs en Europe. Futuribles, December.

Riffault, Helene. 1994. Resultados de la Encuesta de Valores en Francia. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Riffault, Helene. 1994. Le systeme de valeurs des Francais: ce qui a bouge depuis 10 ans. Les Techniques Psychologiques d'Evaluation des Personnes. Paris: Actes du Congres International Inetop.

Riffault, Helene (ed.). 1994. Les Valeurs des Francais. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Riffault, Helene. Les Europeens et la valeur travail. Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 25-46.

Romero, Catalina. 1994. Valores y cambio social en el Peru: algunas diferencias para comparar. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Rosa, G. de. 1993. I valori degli italiani nel contesto Europeo. La Civilta Cattolica 144, 1.

Roussel, Louis. 1995. Vers une Europe des familles? Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 47-62.

Scarbrough, Elinor. 1995. "Materialist-Postmaterialist Value Orientations," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schuur, Wijbrandt H. van (in cooperation with M. Kruijtbosch). 1992. De affectbalans van vijftigplussers in Europa. In D. Hak and R. Wielers, Lang Zal Hij Leven! Opstellen van Frans Wasseur ter Gelegenheid van Zijn Vijftigste Verjaardag. Groningen: Vakgroep Sociologie.

Schuur, Wijbrandt H. van, and Martine Kruijbosch. 1994. El bienestar subjetivo: despliegue de la Escala de Equilibrio Emotivo de Bradburn. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Schwqeisguth, Etienne. 1995. La Montee des valeurs individualistes. Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 131-166. Scida, G. 1993. Associazionismo e attivita non-profit in Italia e in Europa. Aggiornamenti Sociali XLIV 2: 153-68.

Siemienska, Renata. 1994. (ed.) Szkoly niepanstwowe w polskim systemie edukacyjnym (Nonpublic Schools in the Polish Educational System), Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny 1-2 (151-152) (special volume)

Siemienska, Renata. 1996. Kobiety: nowe wyzwania. Starcie przeszlocsi z terazniejszoscia (Women and New Challenges. The Clash of the Past and the Present). Warsaw University Press.

Siemienska, Renata. 1990. (with Ronald Inglehart) O procesach demokratyzacyjnych. Globalna i zachodnio-europejska perspektywa. (Democratization in Poland and West Europe) Panstwo i Kultura Polityczna, 1990.

Siemienska, Renata. 1992. Zaufanie Polakow do roznych narodow w okresie przemian politycznych i ekonomicznych (Poles' Trust toward Other Nations in the Period of Political and Economic Changes) in: Aleksandra Jasinska-Kania (ed.) Bliscy i dalecy. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press: 201-207.

Siemienska, Renata. 1993. Gender as a Factor Differentiating Social Positions in Transition to a Market Economy, in: Mary Nash (ed.) From Dictatorship to Democracy: Women in Mediterranean, Central and Eastern Europe. Barcelona: University of Barcelona Press: 120-168.

Siemienska, Renata. 1994. Polish Women as the Object and Subject of Political Activity in the Communist and Postcommunist Periods, in: B. Nelson and N. Chowdhury (eds.) Women and Politics Worldwide, New Haven: Yale University Press. 608-624.

Siemienska, Renata. 1994. Women in the Period of Systemic Changes in Poland, Journal of Women's History, vol.5, no.3. 70-90.

Siemienska, Renata. 1994. Some Determinants of Polish Attitudes Toward Other Nations During a Period of Transition, in Russell F. Farnen (ed) Nationalism, Ethnicity and Identity.Cross-National and Comparative Perspectives. New Brunswick (U.S.A.) - London (U.K.), Transaction Publishers. 327-344.

Siemienska, Renata. 1994. Viejos y nuevos elementos de los valores democraticos en Polonia, desde una perspectiva international, in Juan Diez Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.) Tendencias mundiales de cambio en los valores sociales y politicos. Madrid, Fundesco. 375-404.

Siemienska, Renata. 1994. "Szkola panstwowa i niepanstwowa a wartosci demokratyczne" (Public and Non-public Schools and Democratic Values). In R. Siemienska (ed.), Szkoly niepanstwowe w systemie edukacji w Polsce (Nonpublic Schools in the Polish Educational System). Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny 1-2 (151-152): 55-78.

Siemienska, Renata. 1995. "Tradycja i rzeczywistosc: miejsce kobiet w spoleczenstwie" (Tradition and Reality - Women's Status in Society). Kobieta i Biznes (Akademicko-gospodarcze Forum). 2-3. 2-6. (published in Polish and English)

Siemienska, Renata. 1995. "Dylematy transformacji w Europie Srodkowej i Wschodniej: Analiza systemu w perspektywie porownawczej" (Dilemmas of Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Analysis of the System in Comparative Perspective), in: E. Tarkowska (ed.), Powroty i kontynuacje . Wyd. IFiS PAN. 117-135.

Siemienska, Renata . Does Gender Make a Difference in Elites' Value Orientation? In Mino Vianello (ed.) The Sound of Breaking Glass: A Cross-National Study of Gender and Elites in 27 Countries. New York: Mac Millan.

Simons, John. 1995. Fertility and Values in 15 Western Countries during the 1980s. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Stoychev, Kancho. 1994. El espacio politico y las estracturas de valores. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco

. Sun, Jia-ming. 1997. Generation Gap: The Background of Social Transition, 1991-1994. (in Chinese). Shanghai: Social Science Institute of Shanghai Press.

Tejumola, Kareem A., Alabas Simpson, and H.O. Akimmagtoe. 1994. Cambio de valores en el ambito del matrimonio y de la familia. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Timms, Noel. 1992. Family and Citizenship. Values in Contemporary Britain. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Tomasi, L. 1994. La Religione dei Giovani Europei. Milano: Angeli.

Torregrosa Peris, Jose R. 1994. Orientaciones internacionales de los espanoles: entre Europa e Iberoamerica. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Tos, Niko. 1994. La (no) religiosidad en Eslovenia. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Turner, Frederick C. and Carlos A. Elordi. 1995. Economic Values and the Role of Government in Latin America. International Social Science Journal 145:473-488.

Vala, Jorge. 1994. La emergencia de los valores post-materialistas en Portugal. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Van Deth, Jan and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Deth, Jan and Elinor Scarbrough. 1995. "Perspectives on Value Change," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Veenhoven, R. 1993. Happiness in Nations. Rotterdam: Risbo.

Villalain, J.L., A. Basterra, and J.M. del Valle. 1992. La Sociedad Espanola de los 90. Madrid: Fundacion Santa Maria, Ediciones SM.

Vinken, Henk, Peter Ester, and Henk-Jan Dirven. 1993. Individualization of the life course and cultural divergence between age groups. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Voye, Liliane, Bernadette Bawin-Legros, Jan Kerkhofs and Karel Dobbelaere. 1992. Belges, Hereux et Satisfaits. Les Valeurs des Belges dans les Annees 90. Brussels: De Boeck-Wesmael.

Webster, Alan C., Edward E. Drawmeek, and Paul E. Perry. 1994. Multiples culturas de valores en una sociedad pequena: sistemas de valores en la Encuesta de Valores de Nueva Zelanda. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Webster, Alan C., and Paul E. Perry. 199X. The Religious Factor in New Zealand Society. Palmerston North: Alpha. Webster, Alan C., and Paul E. Perry. 1992. What Difference Does It Make? Values and Faith in a Shifting Culture. Palmerston North: Alpha.

Whelan, C.T. 1992. Stability and Change in Values and Attitudes Relevant to Women's Participation in the Labour Force and Wider Role in Society: An Analysis of the European Values Survey. Whelan, C.T. (ed.) 1994. Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Wilson, B., and K. Dobbelaere. 1994. A Time to Chant. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Woessner, Christine. 1994. Sudafrica en la encrucijada. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Worcester, Robert M. 1994. Valores y actitudes sociales ante las dimensiones humanas del cambio medioambiental global. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco World Commission on Culture and Development. 1995. Our Creative Diversity. Paris: UNESCO.

Xingrong, Jiang. 1992. An international comparison of morality (in Chinese). State Statistical Bureau, Beijing, China. Xingrong, Jiang. 1991. More and more people pay attention to the environment (in Chinese). State Statistical Bureau, Beijing, China.

Xingrong, Jiang. 1992. The political, economical, educational and social status of Chinese ladies (in Chinese). State Statistical Bureau, Beijing, China. Xingrong, Jiang. 1992. Public viewpoint of market economy (in Chinese). State Statistical Bureau, Beijing, China.

Zulehner, Paul. 1991. Vom Untertan zum Freiheitskunstler. Eine Kulturdiagnose anhand der Untersuchungen "Religion im Leben der Osterreicher 1970-1990". Wien: Herder.

Zulehner, Paul and Herman Denz. 1993. Wie Europa Lebt und Glaubt. Duesseldorf: Patmos. Zanders, Harry and Stephen Harding. Changing World Values in Europe and North America. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Zanders, Harry. 1993. Changing work values. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

File Description

File: WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997

  • File Structure: rectangular

  • Number of cases: 168,482

  • No. of variables per record: 251

  • Logical Record Length: 352

  • Records per Case: 1

  • Data Format: Logical Record Length with SAS and SPSS data definition statements

  • Missing Data: Most of the variables in the questionnaire are 1-digit, using "9" as the missing data code; if the variable has 8 or more categories, "99" is the missing data code. The "Don't know" or "Neither" options should never be suggested or printed on show cards. In a number of cases, a given question was asked in only some of the countries included in these surveys. In these cases, the data are assigned Missing Data codes-- usually "0" or "9" for one-digit variables; or 98 or 99 for two-digit variables. In a number of instances, some countries used "0" while others used "9" as the missing data code. If all data for a given country fall into the missing data code, it indicates that the given item was not asked in that country.

Notes:

This combined dataset follows the format of the 1995-1997 WVS, and contains all variables from the two earlier waves that were included in the 1995-1997 survey. For variables from earlier surveys that were not included in the 1995-1997 survey, see the ICPSR datasets for the 1981-84 and 1990-1993 surveys respectively (WORLD VALUES SURVEY 1981-1983, ICPSR study number 9309 and WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1981-1984 AND 1990-1993, ICPSR study number 6160).

Variable Description

List of Variables:

Variables

V1

Variable Text: SURVEY NUMBER

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

1981-82 WAVE

2.

1990-91 WAVE

3.

1995-1997 WAVE

Notes: THIS IS A CONSTANT

V2

Variable Text: COUNTRY CODE

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

01.

France

02 .

"Britain"

03 .

"West Germany"

04 .

"Italy"

05 .

"Netherlands"

06 .

"Denmark"

07 .

"Belgium"

08 .

"Spain"

09 .

"Ireland"

10 .

"N Ireland"

11 .

"USA"

12 .

"Canada"

13 .

"Japan"

14.

"Mexico"

15.

"S Africa"

16.

"Hungary"

17 .

"Australia"

18 .

"Norway"

19.

"Sweden"

20 .

"Tambov" (Russia)

21 .

"Iceland"

22 .

"Argentina"

23 .

"Finland"

24.

"S Korea"

25 .

"Poland"

26 .

"Switzerland"

27 .

"Puerto Rico"

28 .

"Brazil"

29 .

"Nigeria"

30 .

"Chile"

31 .

"Belarus"

32 .

"India"

33 .

"Czech Republic"

34 .

"East Germany"

35 .

"Slovenia"

36 .

"Bulgaria"

37 .

"Romania"

38 .

"Pakistan"

39 .

"China "

40 .

"Taiwan"

41 .

"Portugal"

42 .

"Austria"

43 .

"Morocco"

44 .

"Turkey"

45 .

"Moscow" (1990)

46 .

"Lithuania"

47 .

"Latvia"

48 .

"Estonia"

49 .

"Ukraine"

50 .

"Russia"

51 .

"Peru"

53 .

"Venezuela"

54 .

"Uruguay"

56 .

"Ghana"

58 .

"Philippines"

61 .

"Moldova"

62 .

"Georgia"

63 .

"Armenia"

64 .

"Azerbaijan"

68 .

"Dominican Republic"

69 .

"Bangladesh"

73 .

"Colombia"

75 .

"Basque Country"

78 .

"Andalusia"

79 .

"Galicia"

80 .

"Valencia"

81 .

"Serbia"

82 .

"Montenegro"

83 .

"Macedonia"

84 .

"Croatia"

85 .

"Slovakia"

93 .

"Bosnia "

Notes: For cross-time comparisons, we have separate samples from Eastern and Western Germany, and from the Chech Republic and Slovakia (in 1990).

V3

Variable Text: A 4-digit number identifying each respondent in the given country.

V4

Question: INTRODUCTION BY INTERVIEWER Hello. I am from the [NAME OF ORGANIZATION]. We are carrying out the [PAKISTANI] part of a world-wide study of what people value in life. This study will interview samples representing most of the world's people. Your name been selected at random as part of a representative sample of the [PAKISTANI] public. I'd like to ask your views on a number of different subjects. Your help will contribute to a better understanding of what people all over the world believe and want out of life. SHOW CARD A Please say, for each of the following, how important it is in your life. Would you say... FAMILY   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY IMPORTANT

2.

RATHER IMPORTANT

3.

NOT VERY IMPORTANT

4.

NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

Notes: In 1990, the English language version of this battery used the word "Quite important" instead of "Rather important" for the second response alternative. Other countries made similar adjustments in the wording of this option. The substitution of "rather important" for "quite important" in 1995 seems to inflate the percentage of positive responses; it does not seem to have any effect on the relative ranking of these items within given countries, so these rankings should be comparable over time.

V5

Question: FRIENDS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY IMPORTANT

2.

RATHER IMPORTANT

3.

NOT VERY IMPORTANT

4.

NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V6

Question: LEISURE TIME 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY IMPORTANT

2.

RATHER IMPORTANT

3.

NOT VERY IMPORTANT

4.

NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V7

Question: POLITICS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY IMPORTANT

2.

RATHER IMPORTANT

3.

NOT VERY IMPORTANT

4.

NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V8

Question: WORK 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY IMPORTANT

2.

RATHER IMPORTANT

3.

NOT VERY IMPORTANT

4.

NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V9

Question: RELIGION 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY IMPORTANT

2.

RATHER IMPORTANT

3.

NOT VERY IMPORTANT

4.

NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V10

Question: Taking all things together, would you say you are:  [READ OUT]  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY HAPPY

2.

QUITE HAPPY

3.

NOT VERY HAPPY

4.

NOT AT ALL HAPPY

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981

V11

Question: All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days? Would you say it is...  (READ OUT REVERSING ORDER FOR ALTERNATE CONTACTS) 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY GOOD

2.

GOOD

3.

FAIR

4.

POOR

5.

VERY POOR

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981

V12

Question: SHOW CARD B With which of these two statements do you tend to agree?  (CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY) A. Regardless of what the qualities and faults of one's parents are, one must always love and respect them. B. One does not have the duty to respect and love parents who have not earned it by their behavior and attitudes  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

TEND TO AGREE WITH STATEMENT A

2.

TEND TO AGREE WITH STATEMENT B

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981

V13

Question: SHOW CARD C Which of the following statements best describes your views about parents' responsibilities to their children?  (CODE ONE ONLY)  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Parents' duty is to do their best for their children even at the expense of their own well-being

2.

Parents have a life of their own and should not be asked to sacrifice their own well-being for the sake of their children

3.

NEITHER [IF VOLUNTEERED]

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V14

Question: SHOW CARD D Here is a list of qualities that children can be encouraged to learn at home. Which, if any, do you consider to be especially important? Please choose up to five.  (CODE FIVE ONLY) GOOD MANNERS   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981

Notes: This battery was asked in 1981, using a format that had the interviewer "code all mentions." In the 1990 and 1995 surveys, the "Important"/"Not mentioned" format shown above was used. The 1990-1995 format elicited a substantially higher proportion of mentions than did the 1981 format; but the relative rankings of given items within given countries seems to be comparable over time. Note: For the 1990 Polish survey, these data present only the respondent's first choice among these qualities.

V15

Question: INDEPENDENCE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V16

Question: HARD WORK 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V17

Question: FEELING OF RESPONSIBILITY 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V18

Question: IMAGINATION 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V19

Question: TOLERANCE AND RESPECT FOR OTHER PEOPLE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V20

Question: THRIFT, SAVING MONEY AND THINGS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V21

Question: DETERMINATION, PERSEVERANCE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V22

Question: RELIGIOUS FAITH 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V23

Question: UNSELFISHNESS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V24

Question: OBEDIENCE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IMPORTANT

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V25

Question: SHOW CARD E Here is a shorter list of things that children can be encouraged to learn. If you had to choose, which one of these do you consider to be the most important thing for a child to learn at home?   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

THRIFT, SAVING MONEY AND THINGS

2.

OBEDIENCE

3.

DETERMINATION, PERSEVERANCE

4.

RELIGIOUS FAITH

9.

DON'T KNOW

V26

Question: And what would you say is the second most important thing for a child to learn?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

THRIFT, SAVING MONEY AND THINGS

2.

OBEDIENCE

3.

DETERMINATION, PERSEVERANCE

4.

RELIGIOUS FAITH

9.

DON'T KNOW

V27

Question: Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MOST PEOPLE CAN BE TRUSTED

2.

CAN'T BE TOO CAREFUL (TRANSLATION: ="HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL")

3.

DON'T KNOW

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981

V28

Question: Now I am going to read off a list of voluntary organizations; for each one, could you tell me whether you are an active member, an inactive member or not a member of that type of organization?  CHURCH OR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

Notes: A question about membership in these organizations was asked in the 1981 and 1990 surveys, but it had a different format, asking first if one "belonged to" any of these organizations; and then, if one did unpaid work for any of them. The format used in 1995 tends to elicit higher levels of claimed "membership," both active and inactive.

V29

Question: SPORT OR RECREATION ORGANIZATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V30

Question: ART, MUSIC OR EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V31

Question: LABOR UNION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V32

Question: POLITICAL PARTY   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V33

Question: ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V34

Question: PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V35

Question: CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V36

Question: ANY OTHER VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATION   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ACTIVE MEMBER

2.

INACTIVE MEMBER

3.

DON'T BELONG

V37

Question: When you get together with your friends, would you say you discuss political matters frequently, occasionally or never? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

FREQUENTLY

2.

OCCASIONALLY

3.

NEVER

9.

DON'T KNOW

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981

V38

Question: SHOW CARD F I am now going to read out some statements about the environment. For each one I read out, can you tell me whether you agree strongly, agree, disagree or disagree strongly?  (READ OUT EACH STATEMENT AND CODE AN ANSWER FOR EACH) I would agree to an increase in taxes if the extra money were used to prevent environmental damage    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

3.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V39

Question: I would buy things at 20% higher than usual prices if it would help protect the environment  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

3.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V40

Question: [AUSTRALIA'S] environmental problems can be solved without any international agreements to handle them  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

3.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V41

Question: Here are two statements people sometimes make when discussing the environment and economic growth. Which of them comes closer to your own point of view? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Protecting the environment should be given priority, even if it causes slower economic growth and some loss of jobs.

2.

Economic growth and creating jobs should be the top priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent

3.

Other answer (VOLUNTEERED)

9.

DON'T KNOW

V42

Question: Which, if any, of these things have you done in the last 12 months, out of concern for the environment? Have you chosen household products that you think are better for the environment?    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

HAVE NOT DONE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V43

Question: Have you decided for environmental reasons to reuse or recycle something rather than throw it away?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

HAVE NOT DONE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V44

Question: Have you tried to reduce water consumption for environmental reasons?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

HAVE NOT DONE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V45

Question: Have you attended a meeting or signed a letter or petition aimed at protecting the environment?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

HAVE NOT DONE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V46

Question: Have you contributed to an environmental organization?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

HAVE NOT DONE

9.

DON'T KNOW

V47

Question: For each of the following pairs of statements, please tell me which one comes closest to your own views: 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

We should emphasize tradition more than high technology; OR

2.

We should emphasize high technology more than tradition.

9.

DON'T KNOW

V48

Question: For each of the following pairs of statements, please tell me which one comes closest to your own views: 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

To build good human relationships, it is most important to try to understand others' preferences; OR

2.

To build good relationships, it is most important to express one's own preferences clearly.

9.

DON'T KNOW

V49

Question: For each of the following pairs of statements, please tell me which one comes closest to your own views: 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Human beings should master nature; OR

2.

Humans should coexist with nature.

9.

DON'T KNOW

V50

Question: For each of the following pairs of statements, please tell me which one comes closest to your own views: 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Humanity has a bright future; OR

2.

Humanity has a bleak future

9.

DON'T KNOW

V51

Question: SHOW CARD G On this list are various groups of people. Could you please sort out any that you would not like to have as neighbors?  (CODE AN ANSWER FOR EACH) PEOPLE WITH A CRIMINAL RECORD   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: This battery was asked in the 1981 survey, but the following alternatives were added in the 1990 survey (and retained in 1995): "people with AIDS," "Drug addicts," "homosexuals."

V52

Question: PEOPLE OF A DIFFERENT RACE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V53

Question: POLITICAL EXTREMISTS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V54

Question: HEAVY DRINKERS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V55

Question: EMOTIONALLY UNSTABLE PEOPLE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V56

Question: MUSLIMS  (link)  

Question: JEWS 

Question: MEMBERS OF NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS 

Question: PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT RELIGION 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: In Western Europe; in other countries, you may substitute "Jews," "Christians" "Gypsies" or some other small but salient minority group. [See country-specific question variants]

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V56A

Question: BLACKS 

Question: MUSLIMS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

V56B

Question: WHITES 

Question: CHRISTIANS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

V56C

Question: COLOUREDS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

V56D

Question: INDIANS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

V57

Question: IMMIGRANTS / FOREIGN WORKERS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V58

Question: PEOPLE WHO HAVE AIDS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V59

Question: DRUG ADDICTS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V60

Question: HOMOSEXUALS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MENTIONED

2.

NOT MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990 AND 1981  (link)

V61

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE

2.

NEITHER

3.

DISAGREE

9.

DK

V62

Question: When jobs are scarce, older people should be forced to retire from work early  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE

2.

NEITHER

3.

DISAGREE

9.

DK

V63

Question: When jobs are scarce, employers should give priority to [SUBSTITUTE YOUR OWN NATIONALITY] people over immigrants 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE

2.

NEITHER

3.

DISAGREE

9.

DK

V64

Question: SHOW CARD H How satisfied are you with the financial situation of your household? If "1" means you are completely dissatisfied on this scale, and "10" means you are completely satisfied, where would you put your satisfaction with your household's financial situation? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

DISSATISFIED

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

SATISFIED

99.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V65

Question: SHOW CARD H AGAIN All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole these days? Please use this card to help with your answer. 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

DISSATISFIED

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

SATISFIED

99.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V66

Question: Some people feel they have completely free choice and control over their lives, while other people feel that what they do has no real effect on what happens to them.  Please use this scale where 1 means "none at all" and 10 means "a great deal" to indicate how much freedom of choice and control you feel you have over the way your life turns out 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NONE AT ALL

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

A GREAT DEAL

99.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V67

Question: Now I'd like to ask you some quesions about how you feel about work-- whether it's work in the home or outside the home. Could you tell me how strongly you agree or disagree with each of the following statements: do you agree strongly, agree, disagree or disagree strongly?  I almost always continue to work on a task until I am satisfied with the result.    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V68

Question: I feel disappointed in myself when I don't accomplish my personal goals  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V69

Question: I like work so much that I often stay up late at night to finish it  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V70

Question: One of my main goals in life has been to make my parents proud  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V71

Question: I make a lot of effort to live up to what my friends expect  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V72

Question: SHOW CARD I Which point on this scale most clearly describes how much weight you place on work (including housework and school work), as compared with leisure or recreation? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

It's leisure that makes life worth living, not work

2.

3.

4.

5.

Work is what makes life worth living, not leisure

9.

DK

V73

Question: SHOW CARD J Now I would like to ask you something about the things which would seem to you, personally, most important if you were looking for a job. Here are some of the things many people take into account in relation to their work.  Regardless of whether you're actually looking for a job, which one would you, personally, place first if you were looking for a job?   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A good income so that you do not have any worries about money

2.

A safe job with no risk of closing down or unemployment

3.

Working with people you like

4.

Doing an important job which gives you a feeling of accomplishment

9.

DK

V74

Question: And what would be your second choice? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A good income so that you do not have any worries about money

2.

A safe job with no risk of closing down or unemployment

3.

Working with people you like

4.

Doing an important job which gives you a feeling of accomplishment

9.

DK

V75

Question: SHOW CARD J2 Here are some more aspects of a job that people say are important. Please look at them and tell me which ones you personally think are important in a job?  (CODE ALL MENTIONED) GOOD PAY   (link)  (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

Notes: The Polish 1990 data present only the respondent's first choice among these aspects of a job.

V76

Question: NOT TOO MUCH PRESSURE   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V77

Question: GOOD JOB SECURITY   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V78

Question: A JOB RESPECTED BY PEOPLE IN GENERAL   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V79

Question: GOOD HOURS   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V80

Question: AN OPPORTUNITY TO USE INITIATIVE   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V81

Question: GENEROUS HOLIDAYS   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V82

Question: A JOB IN WHICH YOU FEEL YOU CAN ACHIEVE SOMETHING   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V83

Question: A RESPONSIBLE JOB   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V84

Question: A JOB THAT IS INTERESTING   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V85

Question: A JOB THAT MEETS ONE'S ABILITIES   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT MENTIONED

2.

MENTIONED

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V86

Question: Imagine two secretaries, of the same age, doing practically the same job. One finds out that the other earns considerably more than she does. The better paid secretary, however, is quicker, more efficient and more reliable at her job. In your opinion, is it fair or not fair that one secretary is paid more than the other? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

FAIR

2.

NOT FAIR

9.

DK

V87

Question: SHOW CARD K There is a lot of discussion about how business and industry should be managed. Which of these four statements comes closest to your opinion?  (CODE ONE ONLY) 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

The owners should run their business or appoint the managers

2.

The owners and the employees should participate in the selection of managers

3.

The government should be the owner and appoint the managers

4.

The employees should own the business and should elect the managers

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V88

Question: People have different ideas about following instructions at work. Some say that one should follow one's superior's instructions even when one does not fully agree with them. Others say that one should follow one's superior's instructions only when one is convinced that they are right. With which of these two opinions do you agree? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Should follow instructions

2.

Depends [IF VOLUNTEERED]

3.

Must be convinced first

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

Notes: In the original dataset, V88 (and also V95,V96,V97, V116 and V178), codes 2 and 3 were reversed. They have been reordered into an ordinal sequence in this dataset.

V89

Question: ARE YOU CURRENTLY (READ OUT AND CODE ONE ONLY) 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MARRIED

2.

LIVING TOGETHER AS MARRIED

3.

DIVORCED

4.

SEPARATED

5.

WIDOWED

6.

SINGLE

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V90

Question: HAVE YOU HAD ANY CHILDREN? IF YES, HOW MANY? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

NO CHILD

1.

1 CHILD

2.

2 CHILDREN

3.

3 CHILDREN

4.

4 CHILDREN

5.

5 CHILDREN

6.

6 CHILDREN

7.

7 CHILDREN

8.

8 OR MORE CHILDREN

9.

NO ANSWER

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V91

Question: What do you think is the ideal size of the family - how many children, if any?

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

NONE

1.

1 CHILD

2.

2 CHILDREN

3.

3 CHILDREN

4.

4 CHILDREN

5.

5 CHILDREN

6.

6 CHILDREN

7.

7 CHILDREN

8.

8 OR MORE CHILDREN

9.

DK, NO ANSWER

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V92

Question: If someone says a child needs a home with both a father and a mother to grow up happily, would you tend to agree or disagree? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

TEND TO AGREE

2.

TEND TO DISAGREE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V93

Question: Do you think that a woman has to have children in order to be fulfilled or is this not necessary? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEEDS CHILDREN

2.

NOT NECESSARY

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V94

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?  (READ OUT):  "Marriage is an out-dated institution" 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE

2.

DISAGREE

9.

DK

V95

Question: If someone said that individuals should have the chance to enjoy complete sexual freedom without being restricted, would you tend to agree or disagree? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

TEND TO AGREE

2.

NEITHER / IT DEPENDS [IF VOLUNTEERED]

3.

TEND TO DISAGREE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V96

Question: If a woman wants to have a child as a single parent but she doesn't want to have a stable relationship with a man, do you approve or disapprove? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

APPROVE

2.

DEPENDS [IF VOLUNTEERED]

3.

DISAPPROVE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V97

Question: If you were to have only one child, would you rather have it be a boy or a girl? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A BOY

2.

IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE (VOLUNTEERED)

3.

A GIRL

9.

DK

V98

Question: People talk about the changing roles of men and women today. For each of the following statements I read out, can you tell me how much you agree with each. Do you agree strongly, agree, disagree, or disagree strongly?  A working mother can establish just as warm and secure a relationship with her children as a mother who does not work    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V99

Question: Being a housewife is just as fulfilling as working for pay  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V100

Question: Both the husband and wife should contribute to household income  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V101

Question: On the whole, men make better political leaders than women do  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V102

Question: If a women earns more money than her husband, it's almost certain to cause problems  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V103

Question: A university education is more important for a boy than for a girl  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

V104

Question: SHOW CARD L People sometimes talk about what the aims of this country should be for the next ten years. On this card are listed some of the goals which different people would give top priority. Would you please say which one of these you, yourself, consider the most important?  CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY UNDER "First Choice."   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A high level of economic growth

2.

Making sure this country has strong defence forces

3.

Seeing that people have more say about how things are done at their jobs and in their communities

4.

Trying to make our cities and countryside more beautiful

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V105

Question: And which would be the next most important?  CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY UNDER "Second Choice." 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

STRONGLY AGREE

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

STRONGLY DISAGREE

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V106

Question: SHOW CARD M If you had to choose, which one of the things on this card would you say is most important?  CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Maintaining order in the nation

2.

Giving people more say in important government decisions

3.

Fighting rising prices

4.

Protecting freedom of speech

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V107

Question: And which would be the next most important?  CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Maintaining order in the nation

2.

Giving people more say in important government decisions

3.

Fighting rising prices

4.

Protecting freedom of speech

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V108

Question: SHOW CARD N Here is another list. In your opinion, which one of these is most important?  CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A stable economy

2.

Progress toward a less impersonal and more humane society

3.

Progress toward a society in which ideas count more than money

4.

The fight against crime

9.

DK

V109

Question: . And what would be the next most important?  CODE ONE ANSWER ONLY 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A stable economy

2.

Progress toward a less impersonal and more humane society

3.

Progress toward a society in which ideas count more than money

4.

The fight against crime

9.

DK

V110

Question: Of course, we all hope that there will not be another war, but if it were to come to that, would you be willing to fight for your country? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V111

Question: I'm going to read out a list of various changes in our way of life that might take place in the near future. Please tell me for each one, if it were to happen, whether you think it would be a good thing, a bad thing, or don't you mind? Less emphasis on money and material possessions    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

GOOD

2.

DON'T MIND

3.

BAD

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V112

Question: Less importance placed on work in our lives  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

GOOD

2.

DON'T MIND

3.

BAD

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V113

Question: More emphasis on the development of technology  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

GOOD

2.

DON'T MIND

3.

BAD

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V114

Question: Greater respect for authority 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

GOOD

2.

DON'T MIND

3.

BAD

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V115

Question: More emphasis on family life  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

GOOD

2.

DON'T MIND

3.

BAD

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V116

Question: In the long run, do you think the scientific advances we are making will help or harm mankind? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

WILL HELP

2.

SOME OF EACH

3.

WILL HARM

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V117

Question: How interested would you say you are in politics? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY INTERESTED

2.

SOMEWHAT INTERESTED

3.

NOT VERY INTERESTED

4.

NOT AT ALL INTERESTED

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V118

Question: SHOW CARD O [LISTS "HAVE DONE," "MIGHT DO," WOULD NEVER DO] Now I'd like you to look at this card. I'm going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I'd like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it. Signing a petition    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

MIGHT DO

3.

WOULD NEVER DO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V119

Question: Joining in boycotts  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

MIGHT DO

3.

WOULD NEVER DO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V120

Question: Attending lawful demonstrations 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

MIGHT DO

3.

WOULD NEVER DO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V121

Question: Joining unofficial strikes 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

MIGHT DO

3.

WOULD NEVER DO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V122

Question: Occupying buildings or factories  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

HAVE DONE

2.

MIGHT DO

3.

WOULD NEVER DO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V123

Question: SHOW CARD P In political matters, people talk of "the left" and "the right." How would you place your views on this scale, generally speaking? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

LEFT

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

RIGHT

99.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V124

Question: SHOW CARD QOn this card are three basic kinds of attitudes concerning the society we live in. Please choose the one which best describes your own opinion CODE ONE ONLY 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

The entire way our society is organized must be radically changed by revolutionary action

2.

Our society must be gradually improved by reforms

3.

Our present society must be valiantly defended against all subversive forces

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V125

Question: SHOW CARD R Now I'd like you to tell me your views on various issues. How would you place your views on this scale? 1 means you agree completely with the statement on the left; 10 means you agree completely with the statement on the right; and if your views fall somewhere in between, you can choose any number in between.    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

INCOMES SHOULD BE MADE MORE EQUAL

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

WE NEED LARGER INCOME DIFFERENCES AS INCENTIVES FOR INDIVIDUAL EFFORT

99.

DK

V126

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY SHOULD BE INCREASED

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY SHOULD BE INCREASED

99.

DK

V127

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD TAKE MORE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT EVERYONE IS PROVIDED FOR

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE MORE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES

99.

DK

V128

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

COMPETITION IS GOOD. IT STIMULATES PEOPLE TO WORK HARD AND DEVELOP NEW IDEAS

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

COMPETITION IS HARMFUL. IT BRINGS OUT THE WORST IN PEOPLE

99.

DK

V129

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IN THE LONG RUN, HARD WORK USUALLY BRINGS A BETTER LIFE

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

HARD WORK DOESN'T GENERALLY BRING SUCCESS - IT'S MORE A MATTER OF LUCK AND CONNECTIONS

99.

DK

V130

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

PEOPLE CAN ONLY GET RICH AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

WEALTH CAN GROW SO THERE'S ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE

99.

DK

V131

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ONE SHOULD BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT MAKING MAJOR CHANGES

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

YOU WILL NEVER ACHIEVE MUCH IN LIFE UNLESS YOU ACT BOLDLY

99.

DK

V132

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

IDEAS THAT HAVE STOOD THE TEST OF TIME ARE GENERALLY BEST

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

NEW IDEAS ARE GENERALLY BETTER THAN OLD ONES

99.

DK

V133

Question: DO YOU THINK IT IS BETTER IF .. OR THAT 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Goods made in other countries can be imported and sold here if people want to buy them;

2.

There should be stricter limits on selling foreign goods here, to protect the jobs of people in this country

9.

DK

V134

Question: How about people from other countries coming here to work. Which one of the following do you think the government should do? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

Let anyone come who wants to?

2.

Let people come as long as there are jobs available?

3.

Place strict limits on the number of foreigners who can come here?

4.

Prohibit people coming here from other countries?

9.

DK

V135

Question: I am going to name a number of organizations. For each one, could you tell me how much confidence you have in them: is it a great deal of confidence, quite a lot of confidence, not very much confidence or none at all?  THE CHURCHES   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V136

Question: THE ARMED FORCES 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V137

Question: THE LEGAL SYSTEM 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V138

Question: THE PRESS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V139

Question: TELEVISION 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V140

Question: LABOR UNIONS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V141

Question: THE POLICE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V142

Question: THE GOVERNMENT IN [WASHINGTON / YOUR CAPITAL] 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V143

Question: POLITICAL PARTIES 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V144

Question: PARLIAMENT 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V145

Question: THE CIVIL SERVICE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V146

Question: MAJOR COMPANIES 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V147

Question: THE GREEN / ECOLOGY MOVEMENT 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V148

Question: THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V149

Question: THE EUROPEAN UNION  (link)  

Question: NAFTA   (link)

Question: EL TRATADO DE LIBRE COMERCIO (TLC) 

Question: ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY (OAU) 

Question: MERCOSUR 

Question: SOUTH ASIAN ASSOCIATION FOR REGIONAL CO-OPERATION (SAARC) 

Question: EUROPEAN UNION 

Question: ANDEAN PACT 

Question: ASEAN 

Question: ORGANIZACION DE ESTADOS AMERICANOS (OEA) 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

Notes: In all European countries; in North America, NAFTA; in other societies, ask about the most important regional organization.

V150

Question: THE UNITED NATIONS 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A GREAT DEAL

2.

QUITE A LOT

3.

NOT VERY MUCH

4.

NONE AT ALL

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V151

Question: SHOW CARD S People have different views about the system for governing this country. Here is a scale for rating how well things are going: 1 means very bad and 10 means very good.  Where on this scale would you put the political system as it was A. in communist times. [IN POLITICAL SYSTEMS THAT HAVE UNDERGONE A REGIME CHANGE WITHIN THE EXPERIENCE OF A MAJORITY OF RESPONDENTS: E.G., MENTION THE COMMUNIST REGIME IN CENTRAL/EASTERN EUROPE; THE FRANCO REGIME IN SPAIN; THE MILITARY REGIME IN CHILE]; B. IN COUNTRIES WHERE THERE HAS BEEN NO REGIME CHANGE IN RECENT TIMES, ASK: ten years ago?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY BAD

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

8.

10.

VERY GOOD

99.

DK

V152

Question: Where on this scale would you put the political system as it is today? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY BAD

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

8.

10.

VERY GOOD

99.

DK

V153

Question: Where on this scale would you put the political system as you expect it will be ten years from now? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY BAD

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

8.

10.

VERY GOOD

99.

DK

V154

Question: I'm going to describe various types of political systems and ask what you think about each as a way of governing this country. For each one, would you say it is a very good, fairly good, fairly bad or very bad way of governing this country? Having a strong leader who does not have to bother with parliament and elections  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY GOOD

2.

FAIRLY GOOD

3.

FAIRLY BAD

4.

VERY BAD

9.

DK

V155

Question: Having experts, not government, 4 9 make decisions according to what they think is best for the country  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY GOOD

2.

FAIRLY GOOD

3.

FAIRLY BAD

4.

VERY BAD

9.

DK

V156

Question: HAVING THE ARMY RULE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY GOOD

2.

FAIRLY GOOD

3.

FAIRLY BAD

4.

VERY BAD

9.

DK

V157

Question: HAVING A DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL SYSTEM 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY GOOD

2.

FAIRLY GOOD

3.

FAIRLY BAD

4.

VERY BAD

9.

DK

V158

Question: In politics, different parties often hold different views. Which do you think is better: 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A party leader should stand firm for what he or she believes, even if others disagree; OR:

2.

A party leader should be prepared to cooperate with other groups, even if it means compromising some important beliefs.

9.

DK

V159

Question: If you had to choose, which would you say is the most important responsibility of government: 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

To maintain order in society; OR:

2.

To respect freedom of the individual.

9.

DK

V160

Question: I'm going to read off some things that people sometimes say about a democratic political system. Could you please tell me if you agree strongly, agree, disagree or disagree strongly, after I read each one of them? In democracy, the economic system runs badly    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE STRONGLY

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

DISAGREE STRONGLY

9.

DK

V161

Question: Democracies are indecisive and have too much squabbling  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE STRONGLY

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

DISAGREE STRONGLY

9.

DK

V162

Question: Democracies aren't good at maintaining order  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE STRONGLY

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

DISAGREE STRONGLY

9.

DK

V163

Question: Democracy may have problems but it's better than any other form of government  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE STRONGLY

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

DISAGREE STRONGLY

9.

DK

V164

Question: Here's one more statement. How strongly do you agree or disagree with it? "Using violence to pursue political goals is never justified."  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE STRONGLY

2.

AGREE

3.

DISAGREE

4.

DISAGREE STRONGLY

9.

DK

V165

Question: How satisfied are you with the way the people now in national office are handling the country's affairs? Would you say you are very satisfied, fairly satisfied, fairly dissatisfied or very dissatisfied?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY SATISFIED

2.

FAIRLY SATISFIED

3.

FAIRLY DISSATISFIED

4.

VERY DISSATISFIED

9.

DK

V166

Question: Generally speaking, would you say that this country is run by a few big interests looking out for themselves, or that it is run for the benefit of all the people?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

RUN BY A FEW BIG INTERESTS

2.

RUN FOR ALL THE PEOPLE

9.

DK

V167

Question: I'd like to ask you about some groups that some people feel are threatening to the social and political order in this society.  Would you please select from the following list the one group or organization that you like least? 

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP OF CODES, 1 THROUGH 9. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

JEWS

2.

CAPITALISTS

3.

STALINISTS / HARD-LINE COMMUNISTS

4.

IMMIGRANTS

5.

HOMOSEXUALS

6.

CRIMINALS

7.

NEO-NAZIS / RIGHT EXTREMISTS

9.

DK

01.

HARD-LINE COMMUNISTS / LEFT EXTREMISTS

03.

MEMBERS OF ETA

01.

IMMIGRANTS WITHOUT VISAS

02.

RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS

03.

ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS

04.

WELFARE RECIPIENTS

07.

LEFT-WING EXTREMISTS

09.

DK

01.

LEFT-WING EXTREMISTS

08.

NONE

01.

MEMBERS OF NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS

01.

CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS

02.

NON-CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS

03.

LEFT EXTREMISTS

07.

RACISTS

08.

PEOPLE OF OTHER RACE

09.

DK

04.

DOMINICAN IMMIGRANTS

06.

DRUG GODFATHERS OR THUGS

08.

EXTREME NATIONALISTS

09.

CUBANS

10.

SPIRITUALISTS

11.

RELIGIOUS FANATICS

12.

LOS ESTADISTAS (ADVOCATED OF STATEHOOD)

13.

LOS INDEPENDENTISTAS (ADVOCATES OF INDEPENDENCE)

14.

LOS AUTONOMISTAS (ADVOCATES OF AUTONOMY

01.

CHRISTIAN ORGANIZATION / COUNCIL

03.

SOCIALISTS

07.

HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS

08.

MUSLIM ORGANIZATION / COUNCIL

01.

MUSLIMS

04.

IMMIGRANTS / PEOPLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES

08.

SHIVSENA / VHP / BAJRANG DAL

09.

PEOPLE FROM OTHER STATES

00.

REFUSE TO ANSWER

01.

CAPITALISTS

02.

COMMUNISTS

03.

IMMIGRANT WORKERS

04.

HOMOSEXUALS

05.

GANGSTERS

06.

RIGHT EXTREMISTS / EXTREME NATIONALISTS

07.

NATIONALIST PARTY (KMT)

08.

PEOPLE PROGRESS PARTY

09.

NEW PARTY

10.

INDEPENDENT TAIWAN ORGANIZATION

11.

LEGISLATIVE YUAN

12.

PEOPLE'S CONGRESS

13.

PARLIAMENT

14.

ANY POLITICAL PARTY

15.

ANY POLITICAL ORGANIZATION

16.

POLITICIANS

17.

PRIVILEGED CLASS

18.

[P;OCE

19.

DRUG USERS

20.

VIOLENCE ORGANIZATION

21.

ANTI-GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION / DEMONSTRATION ORGANIZATION

22.

STRIKE AND LABOR MOVEMENT ORGANIZATION

23.

EXTREMISTS

24.

DONATION-SOLICITING ORGANIZATION

90.

OTHER

99.

DK

01.

MUSLIMS

08.

NONE

01.

CAPITALISTS

02.

HARDCORE SOCIALISTS

03.

HARDCORE RIGHTISTS

04.

ANARCHISTS / TERRORISTS

05.

INFLUENTIAL PEOPLE OCCUPYING POSITIONS IN NEPOTISM-RIDDEN AREAS

1.

PARAMILITARES

2.

GUERRILLA

3.

NARCOTRAFICANTES

4.

HOMOSEXUALS

07.

NEOFASCISTS / RIGHT EXTREMISTS

08.

SERBS

09.

MUSLIMS

Notes: if necessary, use functional equivalent for these items; furnish details with data

V168

Question: Do you think that  [NAME LEAST-LIKED GROUP JUST IDENTIFIED]    (link) should be allowed to:  HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE?   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

V169

Question: TEACH IN OUR SCHOOLS? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

V170

Question: HOLD PUBLIC DEMONSTRATIONS? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

V171

Question: Now I'd like to ask you some questions about the problem of poverty, in this country and in other countries.  (link)  Would you say that today a larger share about the same share, or a smaller share of the people in this country are living in poverty than were ten years ago ? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A LARGER SHARE

2.

ABOUT THE SAME SHARE

3.

A SMALLER SHARE

9.

DK

V172

Question: Why, in your opinion, are there people in this country who live in need? Here are two opinions: Which comes closest to your view? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

They are poor because of laziness and lack of will power

2.

They are poor because society treats them unfairly

9.

DK

V173

Question: In your opinion, do most poor people in this country have a chance of escaping from poverty, or is there very little chance of escaping?  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

THEY HAVE A CHANCE

2.

THERE IS VERY LITTLE CHANCE

9.

DK

V174

Question: Do you think that what the government is doing for people in poverty in this country is about the right amount, too much, or too little? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

TOO MUCH

2.

ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT

3.

TOO LITTLE

9.

DK

V175

Question: In some economically less developed countries, many people are living in poverty. Do you think that what the other countries of the world are doing to help them is about right, too much or too little? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

TOO MUCH

2.

ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT

3.

TOO LITTLE

9.

DK

V176

Question: Some people favor, and others are against, having this country provide economic aid to poorer countries. Are you personally... 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY MUCH FOR

2.

FOR TO SOME EXTENT

3.

SOMEWHAT AGAINST

4.

VERY MUCH AGAINST

9.

DK

V177

Question: How often, if at all, do you think about the meaning and purpose of life?  (READ OUT IN REVERSE ORDER FOR ALTERNATE CONTACTS) 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

OFTEN

2.

SOMETIMES

3.

RARELY

4.

NEVER

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V178

Question: SHOW CARD T Here are two statements which people sometimes make when discussing good and evil. Which one comes closest to your own point of view? A. There are absolutely clear guidelines about what is good and evil. These always apply to everyone, whatever the circumstances. B. There can never be absolutely clear guidelines about what is good and evil. What is good and evil depends entirely upon the circumstances at the time.  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

AGREE WITH STATEMENT A

2.

DISAGREE WITH BOTH [IF VOLUNTEERED]

3.

AGREE WITH STATEMENT B

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION

Question: DO YOU BELONG TO A RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION? IF YES, WHICH ONE?  (link)  IF NO: CODE 0 

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP(S) OF CODES. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP(S)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

NO, NOT A MEMBER

1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

2.

PROTESTANT

3.

ORTHODOX (RUSSIAN / GREEK / ETC.)

4.

JEW

5.

MUSLIM

6.

HINDU

7.

BUDDHIST

8.

OTHER (WRITE IN)

9.

NO ANSWER

0.

BELONG TO NO RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION

1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

2.

MAINLINE OR ESTABLISHED PROTESTANT CHURCH FOR GIVEN COUNTRY

3.

NON-ESTABLISHED OR FUNDAMENTALIST PROTESTANT CHURCHES

4.

JEWISH

5.

ISLAMIC

6.

HINDU

7.

BUDDHIST

8.

OTHER (INCLUDES ORTHODOX, IN EASTERN EUROPE)

9.

NO ANSWER

0.

BELONG TO NO RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION

1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

2.

MAINLINE OR ESTABLISHED PROTESTANT CHURCH FOR GIVEN COUNTRY

3.

NON-ESTABLISHED OR FUNDAMENTALIST PROTESTANT CHURCHES

4.

JEWISH

5.

ISLAMIC

6.

HINDU

7.

BUDDHIST

8.

OTHER (INCLUDES ORTHODOX, IN EASTERN EUROPE)

9.

NO ANSWER

3.

EVANGELICAL

2.

THE CHURCH OF SWEDEN

3.

A FREE CHURCH DENOMINATION

6.

OTHER CHRISTIAN MOVEMENT

7.

ISLAM

3.

PENTECOSTAL / GOSPEL CHURCHES

5.

CHERUBIM AND SERAPHIM (C&S), CELESTIAL

8.

JAIN

2.

MAINSTREAM CHRISTIAN

3.

FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIAN

0.

HIC

1.

KATOLIK

2.

PROTESTAN

3.

RUM ORTODOKS

4.

MUSEVI

5.

MUSLUMAN

6.

GREGORYEN

8.

DIGER

2.

IGLESIA NI CRISTO

16.

ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH

1.

MUSLIM

2.

HINDUISM

3.

BUDDHISM

4.

CHRISTIANITY

5.

ANY OTHER

6.

ATHEIST

10.

UNDOCUMENTED CODE

11.

UNDOCUMENTED CODE

12.

UNDOCUMENTED CODE

1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

2.

PROTESTANT

3.

EVANGELIC

4.

JEW

5.

ROSACRUZ

6.

JEHOVA'S WITNESSES

7.

OTHER

8.

NONE

9.

DK / NA

5.

ISLAMIC

5.

ISLAMIC

8.

GRKOKATOLIK

1.

PROTESTANT

2.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

3.

JEWISH

4.

ORTHODOX CHURCH

5.

MUSLIM

6.

HINDU

7.

BUDDHIST

8.

OTHER

9.

NONE

0.

NONE

1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

2.

OTHER CHRISTIAN (PROTESTANT)

3.

BELIEVE IN GOD, NOT IN CHURCH

4.

JEWISH

5.

MUSLIM

6.

HINDU

7.

BUDDHIST

8.

SPIRITUALISM

9.

DK

10.

OTHER

2.

JEHOVA'S WITNESSES

6.

PRESBYTERIAN

7.

METHODIST

6.

PRESBYTERIAN

7.

METHODIST

0.

NONE

1.

CATHOLIC

2.

ANGLICAN

3.

DUTCH REFORMED

4.

PRESBYTERIAN

5.

LUTHERAN

6.

OTHER CHRISTIAN

8.

ISLAMIC

9.

HINDU

0.

NONE

1.

CHURCH OF SWEDEN (LUTHERAN)

2.

CATHOLIC

3.

PENTECOSTAL

4.

SWEDISH MISSIONARY LEAGUE

5.

SALVATION ARMY

6.

BAPTIST

7.

OREBRO MISSION

8.

EVANGELICAL

9.

OTHER

0.

DK

1.

CATHOLIC

2.

PROTESTANT

7.

BUDDHIST

8.

CONFUCIAN

9.

REFUSED

1.

ROMAN CATHOLIC

2.

PROTESTANT

3.

ORTHODOX

4.

OTHER CHRISTIAN

5.

ISLAM

6.

HINDU

7.

OTHER

9.

NA

6.

GREEK ORTHODOX (NOT HINDU)

7.

GREGORIAN (ARMENIAN)

2.

RUSSIAN ORTHODOX (NOT PROTESTANT)

6.

GREEK ORTHODOX (NOT HINDU)

6.

GREEK ORTHODOX (NOT HINDU)

6.

GREEK ORTHODOX (NOT HINDU)

0.

NONE

1.

RUSSIAN ORTHODOX

2.

BAPTIST

3.

SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST

4.

50 DAYS BELIEVER

5.

OLD BELIEVER

6.

CATHOLIC

7.

JEWISH

8.

BUDDHIST

9.

MUSLIM

98.

OTHER

99.

DID NOT STATE

Coder Instructions: if your own society does not fit into this coding system, please devise an alternative, following this as closely as possible; point out any variations when sending the data.

Notes: WAVE 1 - CANADA: NA; AUSTRALIA: DOCUMENTATION NOT AVAILABLE FOR RELIGIOUS CODES

V180

Question: ASK ALL WERE YOU BROUGHT UP RELIGIOUSLY AT HOME? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

V181

Question: SHOW CARD U Apart from weddings, funerals and christenings, about how often do you attend religious services these days? 

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP OF CODES 1 THROUGH 7. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

MORE THAN ONCE A WEEK

2.

ONCE A WEEK

3.

ONCE A MONTH

4.

ONLY ON SPECIAL HOLY DAYS

5.

ONCE A YEAR

6.

LESS OFTEN

7.

NEVER, PRACTICALLY NEVER

01.

ALWAYS

02.

MORE THAN ONCE A DAY

03.

MORE THAN ONCE A WEEK

04.

ONCE A WEEK

05.

ONCE A MONTH

06.

ONLY ON SPECIAL OCCASIONS

07.

NOT MANY TIMES

08.

NEVER

V182

Question: Independently of whether you go to church or not, would you say you are.. (READ OUT) 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

A RELIGIOUS PERSON

2.

NOT A RELIGIOUS PERSON

3.

A CONVINCED ATHEIST

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V183

Question: Which, if any, of the following do you believe in?  (READ OUT AND CODE ONE ANSWER FOR EACH) DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD?   (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V184

Question: DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIFE AFTER DEATH? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V185

Question: DO YOU BELIEVE PEOPLE HAVE A SOUL? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V186

Question: DO YOU BELIEVE THE DEVIL EXISTS? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V187

Question: DO YOU BELIEVE IN HELL? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V188

Question: DO YOU BELIEVE IN HEAVEN? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V189

Question: DO YOU BELIEVE IN SIN? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V190

Question: SHOW CARD V How important is God in your life? Please use this scale to indicate - 10 means very important and 1 means not at all important. 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NOT AT ALL

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

VERY

99.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V191

Question: Do you find that you get comfort and strength from religion? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

NO

9.

DK

Notes: ASKED IN 1990

V192

Question: SHOW CARD W  Please tell me for each of the following statements whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified, or something in between, using this card.  READ OUT STATEMENTS. CODE ONE ANSWER FOR EACH STATEMENT  Claiming government benefits to which you are not entitled    (link)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V193

Question: Avoiding a fare on public transport  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V194

Question: Cheating on taxes if you have a chance 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V195

Question: Buying something you knew was stolen 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V196

Question: Someone accepting a bribe in the course of their duties  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V197

Question: HOMOSEXUALITY 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V198

Question: PROSTITUTION 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V199

Question: ABORTION 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V200

Question: DIVORCE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V201

Question: Euthanasia-- ending the life of the incurably sick  

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

V202

Question: SUICIDE 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

NEVER JUSTIFIABLE

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

ALWAYS JUSTIFIABLE

99.

DK

GEOGRAPHICAL GROUP TO WHICH RESPONDENT BELONGS ABOVE ALL - FIRST CHOICE

Question: SHOW CARD X  To which of these geographical groups would you say you belong first of all?  substitute your own nation and continent for these 

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP(S) OF CODES. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP(S)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

LOCALITY OR TOWN WHERE YOU LIVE

2.

STATE OR REGION OF COUNTRY WHERE YOU LIVE

3.

[THE U.S.] AS A WHOLE

4.

[NORTH AMERICA]

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DK

1.

THE TOWN WHERE YOU LIVE

2.

THE STATE OR PROVINCE IN WHICH YOU LIVE

3.

YOUR COUNTRY AS A WHOLE (FRANCE, NIGERIA, ETC. AS A WHOLE)

4.

THE CONTINENT IN WHICH YOU LIVE (STATED AS EUROPE, ASIA, ETC.)

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DK

1.

THE TOWN WHERE YOU LIVE

2.

THE STATE OR PROVINCE IN WHICH YOU LIVE

3.

YOUR COUNTRY AS A WHOLE (FRANCE, NIGERIA, ETC. AS A WHOLE)

4.

THE CONTINENT IN WHICH YOU LIVE (STATED AS EUROPE, ASIA, ETC.)

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DK

3.

PUERTO-RICO

4.

ESTADOS UNIDOS

5.

CARIBE

6.

AMERICA LATINA

7.

TODA AMERICA

8.

MUNDO

99.

NA

1.

SEHIR

2.

BOLGE

3.

TURKIYE

4.

AVRUPA

5.

DUNYA

1.

LOCALIDAD, CIUDAD O PUEBLO EN QUE VIVE

2.

PROVINCIA

3.

REGION

4.

EL CARIBE

5.

EL MUNDO ENTERO

9.

DK / NA

1.

BARRIO / VEREDA

2.

CONJUNTO RESIDENCIAL

3.

PUEBLO / CIUDAD DONDE VIVE

4.

REGION DEL PAIS DONDE VIVE

5.

COLOMBIA COMO UN TODO

6.

LATIN AMERICA

7.

EL MUNDO COMO UN TODO

9.

DK

4.

LATIN AMERICA

6.

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC AND DDR TOGETHER

6.

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC AND DDR TOGETHER

4.

IDENTIFICATION WITH EUROPE (NOT SOUTH AMERICA OR LATIN AMERICA)

1  (link) .

COMMUNE WHERE YOU GREW UP

1  (link) .

COMMUNE WHERE YOU NOW LIVE

1  (link) .

CANTON WHERE YOU GREW UP

1  (link) .

CANTON WHERE YOU NOW LIVE

2.

YOUR LINGUISTIC REGION

3.

SWITZERLAND AS A WHOLE

4.

EUROPE

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

4.

LATIN AMERICA (NOT SOUTH AMERICA)

4.

LATIN AMERICA (NOT SOUTH AMERICA)

1.

TOWN YOU LIVE IN

2.

A REGION OF THE RUSSIAN REPUBLIC

3.

RUSSIA AS A WHOLE

4.

SOVIET UNION AS A WHOLE

5.

EUROPE

6.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DID NOT STATE

Notes: WAVE 1 - USA AND CANADA: "THE STATE / PROVINCE YOU LIVE IN" AND "THIS REGION OF THE COUNTRY" WERE ASKED AS TWO SEPARATE OPTIONS IN 1981; THESE HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED INTO CODE 2, 'THE STATE OR REGION IN WHICH YOU LIVE."

Notes: wAVE 2 - THE GREATER MOSCOW SURVEY FOLLOWS THE STANDARD FORMAT

Notes: WAVE 2 - SWITZERLAND: THE ORIGINAL CODES 1-4 WERE COLLAPSED TO BECOME A NEW CODE 1, FOR CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARABILITY

GEOGRAPHICAL GROUP TO WHICH RESPONDENT BELONGS ABOVE ALL - SECOND CHOICE

Question: AND THE NEXT? 

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP(S) OF CODES. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP(S)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

LOCALITY OR TOWN WHERE YOU LIVE

2.

STATE OR REGION OF COUNTRY WHERE YOU LIVE

3.

[THE U.S.] AS A WHOLE

4.

[NORTH AMERICA]

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DK

1.

THE TOWN WHERE YOU LIVE

2.

THE STATE OR PROVINCE IN WHICH YOU LIVE

3.

YOUR COUNTRY AS A WHOLE (FRANCE, NIGERIA, ETC. AS A WHOLE)

4.

THE CONTINENT IN WHICH YOU LIVE (STATED AS EUROPE, ASIA, ETC.)

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DK

1.

THE TOWN WHERE YOU LIVE

2.

THE STATE OR PROVINCE IN WHICH YOU LIVE

3.

YOUR COUNTRY AS A WHOLE (FRANCE, NIGERIA, ETC. AS A WHOLE)

4.

THE CONTINENT IN WHICH YOU LIVE (STATED AS EUROPE, ASIA, ETC.)

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DK

3.

PUERTO-RICO

4.

ESTADOS UNIDOS

5.

CARIBE

6.

AMERICA LATINA

7.

TODA AMERICA

8.

MUNDO

99.

NA

1.

SEHIR

2.

BOLGE

3.

TURKIYE

4.

AVRUPA

5.

DUNYA

1.

LOCALIDAD, CIUDAD O PUEBLO EN QUE VIVE

2.

PROVINCIA

3.

REGION

4.

EL CARIBE

5.

EL MUNDO ENTERO

9.

DK / NA

1.

BARRIO / VEREDA

2.

CONJUNTO RESIDENCIAL

3.

PUEBLO / CIUDAD DONDE VIVE

4.

REGION DEL PAIS DONDE VIVE

5.

COLOMBIA COMO UN TODO

6.

LATIN AMERICA

7.

EL MUNDO COMO UN TODO

9.

DK

4.

LATIN AMERICA

6.

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC AND DDR TOGETHER

6.

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC AND DDR TOGETHER

4.

IDENTIFICATION WITH EUROPE (NOT SOUTH AMERICA OR LATIN AMERICA)

1  (link) .

COMMUNE WHERE YOU GREW UP

1  (link) .

COMMUNE WHERE YOU NOW LIVE

1  (link) .

CANTON WHERE YOU GREW UP

1  (link) .

CANTON WHERE YOU NOW LIVE

2.

YOUR LINGUISTIC REGION

3.

SWITZERLAND AS A WHOLE

4.

EUROPE

5.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

4.

LATIN AMERICA (NOT SOUTH AMERICA)

4.

LATIN AMERICA (NOT SOUTH AMERICA)

1.

TOWN YOU LIVE IN

2.

A REGION OF THE RUSSIAN REPUBLIC

3.

RUSSIA AS A WHOLE

4.

SOVIET UNION AS A WHOLE

5.

EUROPE

6.

THE WORLD AS A WHOLE

9.

DID NOT STATE

Coder Instructions: [Wave 3]- substitute your own nation and continent for these

Notes: WAVE 1 - USA AND CANADA: "THE STATE / PROVINCE YOU LIVE IN" AND "THIS REGION OF THE COUNTRY" WERE ASKED AS TWO SEPARATE OPTIONS IN 1981; THESE HAVE BEEN COLLAPSED INTO CODE 2, 'THE STATE OR REGION IN WHICH YOU LIVE."

Notes: WAVE 2 - THE GREATER MOSCOW SURVEY FOLLOWS THE STANDARD FORMAT

Notes: SWITZERLAND, WAVE 2 - THE ORIGINAL CODES 1-4 WERE COLLAPSED TO BECOME A NEW CODE 1, FOR CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARABILITY

V205

Question: How proud are you to be FRENCH? (substitute your own nationality for 'French') 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

VERY PROUD

2.

QUITE PROUD

3.

NOT VERY PROUD

4.

NOT AT ALL PROUD

5.

[IF VOLUNTEERED}: I AM NOT [FRENCH]

9.

DK

V206

Question: Were you born in the UNITED STATES [this country]? IF NO: Where were you born?    (link)

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP OF CODES, 1 THROUGH 7. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

YES

2.

LATIN AMERICA

3.

CANADA

4.

ASIA

5.

EUROPE

6.

AFRICA

7.

OTHER

9.

DK

0.

NOT APPLICABLE

77.

OTHER

98.

NO ANSWER

99.

DK

08.

REST OF SPAIN

01.

PUERTO RICO

02.

USA

03.

CUBA

04.

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

05.

LATIN AMERICA

06.

SPAIN

07.

EUROPE

08.

OTHER

99.

DK

08.

RUSSIA

10.

UKRAINE

11.

BALTIC RESP

12.

TRANSCAUCASUS

13.

MIDDLE ASIA

14.

MOLDOVA

09.

DK

08.

PAKISTAN

10.

BANGLADESH

11.

NEPAL

12.

SRI LANKA

01.

EVET

02.

BALKANLAR

07.

DIGER

08.

B AVRUPA

10.

TURKI

11.

IRAN

12.

CIN

08.

BALTIC RESP

10.

MIDDLE ASIA

11.

TRANSCAUCASUS

12.

MOLDOVA

13.

UKRAINE, BELARUS, RUSSIA

09.

DK

09.

DK

08.

RUSSIA

10.

BALTIC

11.

CAUCASUS

12.

UKRAINE / BELARUS

14.

MIDDLE ASIA

15.

SIBERIA / FAR EAST

13.

GERMANY

08.

RUSSIA

10.

ARMENIA

11.

GEORGIA

12.

MIDDLE ASIA

13.

OTHER CIS

08.

RUSSIA

10.

GEORGIA

11.

AZERBAIJAN

12.

MIDDLE ASIA

13.

OTHER CIS

14.

BALTIC RESP

08.

OUTSIDE EUROPE

V207

Question: (If no) In what year did you come to the UNITED STATES [to this country]? 

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

0.

NOT APPLICABLE

1.

WITHIN PAST TWO YEARS

2.

WITHIN PAST 3-5 YEARS

3.

6-10 YEARS AGO

4.

11-15 YEARS AGO

5.

MORE THAN 15 YEARS AGO

9.

DK

SUBJECTIVE SENSE OF ETHNIC IDENTITY

Question: SHOW CARD Y   Which of the following best describes you? Just call out one of the letters on this card.  

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP(S) OF CODES, 1 THROUGH 5 AND 9. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP(S)

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

[A] Above all, I am an [FIRST ETHNIC MINORITY]

2.

[B] Above all, I am a [SECOND ETHNIC MINORITY]

3.

[C] Above all, I am a [THIRD ETHNIC MINORITY]

4.

[D] Above all, I am an [FOURTH ETHNIC MINORITY]

5.

[E] I am an [MAJORITY NATIONALITY] first and a member of some ethnic group second [modify the ethnic groups in this question to fit your own society]

9.

DK

01.

ONLY FEEL BASQUE, GALICIAN, ETC.

02 .

More Basque, Galician, etc. than Spanish

03 .

As much Basque, Galician, etc. as Spanish

04 .

More Spanish than Basque, Galician, etc.

05.

Only feel Spanish

09.

DK

01.

Hispanic American

02 .

Black American

03.

White American

04 .

Asian American

05 .

American First and some Ethnic Group Second

09.

DK

01 .

Latino

02 .

Mestizo

03 .

Spanish

04 .

Indigenous

05 .

Mexican first

04 .

Indian

05 .

Zulu

06.

Xhosa

07 .

South Sotho

08 .

Tswana

09 .

Sepedi

10 .

Venda

11 .

English-speaking South African

12 .

Afrikaans-speaking South African

13 .

Afrikaner

14 .

South African first

15 .

Muslim

16 .

Swazi

17 .

African

18 .

Other

19.

None

01 .

Swedish

02 .

other language

03.

other culture

04 .

other religion

05.

other language, culture, and religion

01.

Niemcem

02 .

Ukraincem

03 .

Polakiem

04.

Bialorusinem

05 .

Litwinem

06 .

I'm first polish and a member of some ethnic group second

01 .

Hispanic-north american

02 .

African-Puerto Rican

03 .

White Puerto Rican

04 .

Cuban-Puerto Rican

05 .

Dominican-Puerto Rican

06 .

Puerto Rican-American

07.

Puerto Rican first

08 .

North-american first

01 .

Black-Brazilian

02 .

Indio

03.

White-Brazilian

04.

Asian-Brazilian

01 .

Hausa

02.

Yoruba

03 .

Igbo

04.

Minority ethnic group

05 .

Nigerian first

01 .

Latino

02 .

Indio

03.

blanco

04.

Mestizo

01 .

Belar.cit.+ nat.

02 .

Belarussian

03.

Russian

04.

Nat. minority

09.

DK

01 .

Hindu

02 .

Muslim

03 .

OBC

04 .

Indian above all

05 .

Dalit

06 .

Indian first, member of ethnic group second

01 .

Slovene

02 .

Montenegrin

03 .

Croat

04.

Italian

05 .

Hungarian

06 .

Macedonian

07 .

Muslim

08.

Albanian

09 .

Serb

10 .

Yugoslav

11 .

Other

01 .

Taiwanese first

02 .

Chinese first

03.

Taiwanese first, Chinese second

04 .

Chinese first, Taiwanese second

01 .

Turk

02.

Sunni Turk

03.

Alevi Turk

04.

Kurt

05 .

Laz

06 .

Gocmen

07.

Rum,ermeni

08 .

Diger

01 .

Lithuanian

02 .

Russian

03.

other Nat. minority

09.

DK

01 .

Latvian

02 .

Russian

03 .

Nat. minority

04.

Lat. City Nat

09 .

DK

01.

Estonian

02 .

Russian

03.

Nat. minority

04 .

Lat. City Nat.

09 .

DK

01.

Ukrainian

02 .

Russian

03.

Nat. minority

04.

Lat. City Nat

09 .

DK

01 .

Russian

02 .

Ukrainian

03 .

Tatar

04.

Komi

05.

Mordovian

06 .

Kabardinets

07 .

Balkarets

08 .

Other

09.

No answer

01 .

Provinciano

02 .

Provinciano/Limeno

03 .

Tan provinciano limeno como peruano

04 .

Mas peruano que provinciano/limeno

09 .

Don't know

01 .

Creole

02.

European

03 .

Latin American

04 .

Indigenous

05 .

Venezuelan first

01 .

Hispanic Filipino

02 .

American Filipino

03 .

Chinese Filipino

04 .

Japanese Filipino

05 .

Filipino first

06 .

Member of an ethnic group first

01.

Moldavian

02 .

Russian

03 .

Nat. minority

04 .

Mold. City Nat.

09 .

DK

01 .

belong ethnic group second place

02 .

Georgian

03 .

Russian

09 .

NA

10 .

Azerbaijanian

11.

Abkhazian

12.

Osethian

13.

Greek

14.

Jewish

15.

Kurd

16 .

Armenian

01.

First resident of Georgia, than minority

02 .

Above all I am Georgian

03 .

Above all I am Russian

04.

Above all - national minority

09 .

D/K

01 .

Arm. City Nat.

02 .

Armenian

03.

Russian

04 .

Nat. minority

09.

DK\NA

01 .

Azb. City Nat.

02 .

Azerbaijanian

03 .

Russian

04.

Nat. minority

09 .

DK/NA

01.

Bangladeshi

01 .

Latino

02.

Mestizo

03 .

Black

04.

Indigena

05 .

Blanco

06 .

Mulato

07 .

I'm first Colombian and a member of some ethnic group second

1.

Black

2 .

Mestizo

3 .

Indigena

4 .

Blanco

01 .

Yugoslav first

02 .

Serb

03 .

Montenegrin

04 .

Muslim

05 .

Albanian

06 .

Hungarian

07 .

Croat

08.

Other

01 .

Above all, Croat

02.

Above all, Serb

03 .

Above all, some other ethnic group

05.

Croatian citizen first and a member of some ethnic group second

01 .

French Canadian

02 .

English Canadian

03 .

Ethnic Canadian

04 .

Canadian first and then member of ethnic group

05 .

Canadian first and only

01 .

Latino

02 .

Mestizo

03 .

Spanish

04 .

Indian

05 .

I am a Mexican first and a member of some ethnic group second

01 .

Above all, I am Hausa

02 .

Above all, I am Igbo

03 .

Above all, I am Yoruba

04 .

I am a Nigerian first and a member of some ethnic group second

09 .

D.K.

01 .

Latino

02 .

Indian

03 .

White

04 .

Mestizo (mixed white and Indian)

05 .

I am Chilean first and a member of some ethnic group second.

01 .

Above all, I am a Hindu

02 .

Above all, I am a Muslim

03 .

Above all, I am a Christian

04 .

Above all, I am a member of some other religious denominations--Buddhist, Jain, Parsee, Sikh, etc.

05 .

I am an Indian first and a member of some ethnic group second

01 .

Han nationality

02 .

Zhuang nationality

03 .

Hui nationality

04 .

Uygur nationality

05 .

Miao nationality

06 .

Chinese first and then a minority member

Notes: WAVE 2 - BULGARIA: Documentation not available

V209

Question: What language do you normally speak at home? 

Variable Text: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL COUNTRIES USE THE FIRST GROUP OF CODES, 1 THROUGH 5 , 77,98 AND 99. BELOW THESE ARE LISTED COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CODES THAT DIFFER FROM THE FIRST GROUP

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

1.

ENGLISH

2.

SPANISH

3.

FRENCH

4.

CHINESE

5.

JAPANESE

77.

OTHER

98 .

NOT APPLICABLE / NOT ASKED

99.

DK (DON'T KNOW) / NA (NO ANSWER)

01.

GERMAN

03 .

Dutch

04 .

Polish

05 .

Russian

06 .

Turkish

77 .

Other

99 .

DK/NA

01 .

Spanish

02 .

Catalan

03.

Vasco

04.

Gallego

05 .

Valenciano

77 .

Other

99.

No answer

02 .

Afrikaans

03 .

Zulu

04 .

Xhosa

05 .

Tswana

06 .

South Sotho/Sesotho

07 .

North Sotho/Sepedi

08 .

Venda

09 .

Tsonga/Shangaan

10 .

Ndebele

11 .

Swazi

12.

Indian language

13.

Other African

14 .

Other European

77 .

Other

01.

Swedish

02 .

Finnish

03 .

Nordic

04 .

Spanish

05 .

Serbian

06.

European

07 .

Turkish

08 .

Persian

77 .

Other

01 .

Finnish

03 .

French

06 .

German

07 .

Italian

03.

Both, but more English than Spanish

04 .

Both, but more Spanish than English

05 .

Both equally, English and Spanish

06 .

Spanish and another that is not English

01 .

Portuguese

02 .

Italian

04 .

Hausa

05 .

Yoruba

06 .

Igbo

07 .

Pidgin

77 .

Other

01 .

Belarussian

02 .

Russian

03 .

Polish

04 .

Ukrainian

77 .

Other

99.

DK

02 .

Hindi

03 .

Malayalam

04 .

Tamil

05 .

Gujarati

06 .

Telegu

07 .

Orija

08.

Urdu

09 .

Bengali

10 .

Punjabi

11 .

Marethi

12 .

Kanneda

01.

Slovene

02.

Other language of former Yugoslavia

77 .

Other foreign language

01 .

Mandarin

02 .

Taiwanese

03 .

Aboriginal language

04 .

Hakka

77 .

Other

01 .

Turkce

02 .

Arapca

03 .

Kurtce

04 .

Zaza

05.

Kirmanci

06 .

Lazca

07 .

Bosnakca

08 .

Diger

09 .

Don't know

01.

Lithuanian

02.

Russian

77.

Other

09 .

DK

01 .

Latvian

02 .

Russian

77 .

Other

99 .

DK

01 .

Estonian

02.

Russian

03 .

Bilingual

77.

Other

99 .

DK

01 .

Ukrainian

02 .

Russian

77 .

Other

99 .

DK

01.

Russian

02 .

Ukrainian

03 .

Tatar

04 .

Komi

05 .

Mordovian

06 .

Kabardinskii

07 .

Balkarskii

77 .

Other

99 .

No answer

01 .

Spanish

02.

Quechua

03.

Aymara

01.

English

02 .

Akan

03 .

Ewe

04 .

Galadahngbe

05.

Ranjaga

06 .

Hausa

01 .

Tagalog

02 .

Other Philippine languages

03.

Cebuano

04 .

Ilonggo

05 .

Ilokano

06 .

Bicolano

07.

Chavacano

08 .

Waray

13.

Kapampangan

14 .

Pangasinense

15 .

Bisaya (unspecified)

16 .

Aklanon

17 .

Haoist

18.

Ibatan

19 .

Ibanag

20 .

Zambal

21 .

Antiqueno

22 .

Masbateno

23.

Kankara-Uy

24 .

Ibaloy

25 .

Boholanon

26 .

Maranao

27 .

No code available

28 .

Karay-A

29 .

Surigaonon

30 .

Kinamiguin

31 .

Davaoe

32.

Bagubu

33 .

Maguindanao

34 .

Kaulo

35 .

Subanon

36 .

Iranon

37.

Kalayan

38.

Bilaan

39 .

Tausog

40.

Muslim

41 .

Binukid

42.

Suluanon

43.

Manobo

99 .

No answer

01 .

Moldavian

02 .

Russian

77 .

Other

09 .

DK

01.

Georgian

02.

Russian

03 .

Armenian

04 .

Azerbaijan

05.

Greek

07 .

Osethian

08 .

Hebrew

13 .

Abkhazian

14 .

Kurd

01 .

Georgian

02.

Russian

03 .

Armenian

04 .

Azerbaijanian

05 .

Greek

06 .

Mengrelian

07 .

Osetian

08 .

Jewish

09.

D/A

10 .

Iezid

11 .

Lazian

12 .

Turkish

01 .

Armenian

02 .

Russian

03 .

Jewish

04 .

Iezid

05.

Greek

09.

DK/NA

01 .

Azerbaijanian

02 .

Russian

03 .

Talish

04.

Lezgin

05 .

Avarian

06 .

Iranian

07.

Tatarian

99 .

DK/NA

01.

Serbian

02 .

Serbo-Croatian, Croato-Serbian

03.

Croatian

04 .

Bosnian

05.

Montenegrin

06 .

Hungarian

07 .

Albanian

77 .

Other

09 .

More than one equally

Notes: ARGENTINA: NOT ASKED. PHILIPPINES: MANY OF THE CODES CONTAIN 5 OF FEWER CASES.

Notes: MODIFY THE LIST OF LANGUAGES TO FIT YOUR OWN SOCIETY

POLITICAL PARTIES [FIRST CHOICE]

Question: SHOW CARD Z If there were a national election tomorrow, for which party on this list would you vote? Just call out the number on this card. If DON'T KNOW: Which party appeals to you most? 

Variable Text: POLITICAL PARTY CODES

GENERAL CODES

Value

Label

Frequency

Text

77.

OTHER

80.

NONE

88.

WOULD NOT VOTE

98.

NOT APPLICABLE / NOT ASKED

99.

DK /NA

01.

Conservative

02.

Labour

03.

Liberal Democrats (Lib Dem)

04.

Scottish/Welsh Nationalist

05.

Undecided

01 .

CDU/CSU

02 .

SPD

03 .

FDP

04 .

All.90/Greens

05.

PDS

06 .

Republicans

07 .

Drivers Party

08 .

Woman's Party

09 .

Free voters

10 .

Gray Panthers

11 .

OEDP

12.

PBS

13 .

Pink List

01 .

Partido Popular (PP)

02 .

Partido Socialista Obrero Espanol (PSOE)

03 .

Centro Democratico y Social (CDS)

04 .

Izquierda Unida (IU)

05 .

Ecologistas (Verdes)

06 .

Convergencia y Union (CIU)

07 .

Esquerra Republicana de Cataluna (ERC)

08 .

Partido Nacionalista Vasco (PNV)

09 .

Eusko Alkartasuna (EA)

10 .

Herri Batasuna (HB)

11 .

Union Alavesa (UA)

12 .

Plazandrea

13 .

Union del Pueblo Navarro (UPN)

14 .

Coalicion Gallega (CG)

15 .

Bloque Nacionalista Gallego (BNG)

16 .

Partido Andalucista (PA)

17 .

Partido Andaluz Progresista (PAP); Pachecho

18 .

Coalicion Canaria (CC)

19 .

Centro Canarias Independent (CCI)

20 .

Asociacion Independiente Canaria (AIC)

21 .

Asamblea Majorera

22 .

Partido Nacionalista Canario (PNC)

23 .

Izquierda Canaria (ICAN)

24 .

Partido Regionalista Cantaabro (PRC)

25 .

Partido Aragones Regionalista (PAR)

26 .

Extremadura Unida (EU)

27 .

Union Valenciana (UV)

80 .

Blank

01 .

Republicans

02 .

Democrats

99 .

Don't know

77 .

A third party (NOTE: This includes "Independent" )

01 .

Liberal Democratic Party

02 .

New Frontier Party

03 .

Socialist Party

04 .

Smeigaki

05 .

Communist Party

01 .

Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI)

02 .

National Action Party (PAN)

03 .

Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD)

04 .

Labor Party (PT)

01 .

African National Congress (ANC)

02 .

Azanian People (AZAPO)

03 .

Conservative Party (CP)

04 .

Democratic Party (DP)

05 .

Freedom Front (FF)

06 .

Inkatha Freedom (IFP)

07 .

National Party (NP)

08 .

Pan Africanist Congress (PAC)

09 .

South African Congress (SACP)

10 .

Coloured Resistance

11 .

African Christ Democratic Party (ACDP)

12 .

UNDOCUMENTED (N=204)

13 .

Refused

14 .

UNDOCUMENTED (9)

15 .

UNDOCUMENTED (189)

16 .

UNDOCUMENTED (32)

01 .

Australian Labor Party

02 .

Liberal Party

03 .

National Party

04 .

Green Party

05 .

Australian Democrats

06 .

Country Liberal Party

07 .

Independent

01.

Labour Party

02 .

Progressive Party

03 .

Conservatives

04 .

Christian People's party

05.

Red Alliance

06.

Center party

07 .

Socialist Left Party

08 .

Liberal party

10 .

Too young to vote

01 .

Centerpartiet

02 .

Folkpartiet

03 .

KDS

04 .

Miljopartiet

05 .

Moderaterna

06 .

Socialdemokraterna

07 .

Vansterpartiet

09 .

Not allowed to vote

01 .

Agrarian Party (Lapshin)

02 .

Power to the People (Ryzhkov)

03 .

Forward, Russia! (B. Fedorov)

04 .

Democratic Russia ( Starovoytova)

05 .

Democratic Choice of Russia-United Democrats (Gaidar)

06 .

Power (Rutskoi)

07 .

Women of Russia (Lahova)

08 .

For the Motherland (Polevanov)

09 .

Communist Party of the Russian Federation (Zyuganov)

10 .

Communists/Working Russia-for the Soviet Union (Anpylov)

11 .

Congress of Russian Communities (Skokov)

12 .

Left-Centrist Bloc (Ribkin)

13 .

Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia (Zhirinovsky)

14 .

Our Home is Russia (Chernomyrdin)

15 .

Republican Party of the Russian Federation ("Pamfilova-Gurov-Lysenko")

16 .

Party of Self-Government (Sv. Fedorov)

17 .

Trade Unions and Manufacturers-Union of Labor (Shmakov)

18 .

Yabloko [Apple] (Yavlinski)

80 .

No such party

99 .

Hard to say

01 .

Partido Justicialista

02 .

Union Civica Radical

03 .

Frepaso

04 .

Modin

07 .

Blank ballot

01 .

Suomen Sosia Lidemokrattinen (SDP)

02 .

Suomen Keskusta (KESK)

03 .

Kansallien Kokoomus (KOK)

04 .

Vasemmistolitto

05 .

Ruotsalainen Kansan Pudue (RKP)

06 .

Vihrea Liitto

07 .

Suomen Kirsstillinen Litto (SKL)

08 .

Nuorsuomalainen Pudue (NUSU)

09 .

Perussuomalaiset (PS)

10 .

Jokin Muu Ryhmittyma

97 .

En Aanestaisi

98 .

Not asked

01.

Solidarnose

02 .

PSL

03 .

ROP

04 .

SLD

05 .

UPR

06.

UP

07.

UW

08 .

KPEIR

09 .

Narodowo

10 .

Inna partia lub organizacja

11 .

Nie zamierzam brac udzialu wyborach

97 .

trudno powiedziec

01 .

Parti Radical -Démocratique

02 .

Parti Socialiste Suisse

03 .

Parti Démocrate Chrétien

04 .

Union Démocratique du Centre

05 .

Parti Ecologiste Suisse

06 .

Parti des Automobilistes

07 .

Démocrates Suisses

08 .

Parti Libéral Suisse

09 .

Alliance des Indépendants

10 .

Parti Evangélique et Populaire

11 .

Parti Suisse du Travail/Parti Ouvrier Populaire

12 .

Parti Chrétien-Social Suisse

01 .

Partido Nuevo Progresista

02 .

Partido Popular Democratica

03 .

Partido Independentista Puertorriqueno

01.

Party of Brazilian Democratic Movement (PMDB)

02 .

Workers' Party (PT)

03 .

Brazilian Social Democracy (PSDB)

04 .

Democratic Labor Party (PDT)

05.

Brazilian Progresist Party (PPB)

06.

Liberal Front Party (PFL)

07 .

Brazilian Workers Party (PTB)

09 .

Liberal Party (PL)

10 .

Communist Party (PcdoB)

11 .

Green Party (PV)

12.

National Renovation Party (PRN)

13 .

Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB)

15.

Christian Democrats (PDC)

16.

PPS

17 .

PSC

18 .

PST

19 .

PMN

20.

PRONA

22.

PC

23 .

PPR

98 .

Not asked

01 .

UDI (Independent Democratic Union)

02 .

PPD (Party for Democracy)

03.

RN (National Renovation)

04.

PHV (Greens - Humanists)

05.

PRSD (Radicals)

06.

PDC (Christian Democrats)

07 .

PS (Socialist Party)

08 .

UCCP (Center-Center Union)

09.

None

10 .

PC (Communist Party)

01 .

Agrarian Party

02.

Popular Front

03 .

Women Party

04 .

People's Gram.

05 .

Liberal Democratic Party

06 .

Christian Democratic Union

07 .

Common Sense Party

08 .

Unity/Consent Party

09 .

Party of Labor

10 .

Communist Party

11 .

Beer Amateurs Party

12 .

patriotic Union

13 .

Republic Labor Party

14.

Slavonic Union

15 .

United Civil Party

16 .

Pres. Lucashenkn

01 .

Congress - I

02.

BJP

03 .

Janata Dal

04 .

Samajbadi Party

05 .

BSP

06.

Congress Tiwary

07.

Telgu Desham Party

08 .

Shn Sena

09 .

CPI

10 .

CPI (M)

11.

Forward Block

12 .

Karnataka Congress Party

13.

Left Front

14.

National Front

15.

Republican Party of India

16 .

United Front

17 .

Left Democratic Party

18 .

Muslim League

19 .

Local/regional parties

20 .

Independent parties

21 .

MIM

22 .

Communal parties

23.

RSP

24 .

SULI

25 .

TMC

26.

DMK

27 .

AIDMK

28 .

Samatha Party

29 .

Akali Dal

30 .

Uttra Khand

01 .

CDU/CSU

02 .

SPD

03 .

FDP

04 .

All.90/Greens

05 .

PDS

06 .

Republicans

07 .

Drivers Party

08 .

Woman's Party

09.

Free voters

10 .

Gray Panthers

11 .

OEDP

12 .

PBS

01 .

Liberal Democracy of Slovenia

02.

Slovene People's Party

03 .

Slovene National Party

04 .

Social Democratic Party of Slovenia

05 .

Slovene Christian Democrats

06 .

Associated List of Social Democrats

07 .

Greens of Slovenia

08 .

Democratic Party of Slovenia

09 .

Slovene National Right

10 .

Democratic Party of Pensioners

Documentation not available

98 .

Not asked

01 .

Nationalist Party

02.

Democratic Progressive Party

03 .

New Party

05 .

Other party

77 .

Other response

99 .

Don't know, no response

01 .

Motherland Party - Center right (ANAP)

02 .

CHP

03 .

DSP

04 .

True Path Party -- Center right (DYP)

05 .

HADEP

06 .

Prosperity Party - Religious Fundamentalist (RP)

07 .

MHP

08 .

BBP

09 .

Diger

10 .

Kararsiz

11 .

Hicibiri

12 .

Asiri Sag

01 .

Republican Party

02 .

Liberal Union

03 .

Center Union

04 .

Union of Russians

05.

Christian Democratic Union

06.

Socialist Party

07.

Freedom Union

08 .

Peasants Party

09 .

Electoral Act.Poles

10 .

Social Democratic Party

11 .

Union of Political Prisoners

12.

National Party "Young Lithuania"

13.

Freedom League

14.

Gyvenimo Logikos

15 .

Democratic Labor Party

16.

Tautininku and Democratic Party Alliance

17 .

All Ethnic Minorities

18 .

Women's Party

19 .

Homeland Union

20.

Social Justice Party

21.

Christian Democratic Party

22 .

People's Party

23.

Economy Party

24 .

Progress Party

01.

Liberal Party

02 .

Farmers -- Christian Democrats

03 .

Association Unprivil.

04 .

Unity Party

05.

Coalition Democratic Labor Party

06 .

National Harmony

07 .

United Farmers

08 .

Party of Russian Citizens

09 .

Saimnieks

10 .

Socialist Party

11 .

National Democratic Party

12 .

Our Land -- Antcom.

13 .

Siegerist Party

14.

Fatherland and Freedom

15 .

Popular Front

16 .

Tautsaimnieks

17 .

Latvias Way

18 .

LNNK -- Green Party

19 .

Democratic Party

01 .

Democratic Union

02 .

Democratic Labor Party

03.

Center Party

04.

Estonian Home

05 .

Coalition Party

06 .

Rural Party

07 .

Country People

08 .

Family League

09 .

National Rangers Party

10.

National League

11.

Reform Party

12 .

Greens

13 .

Royalist Party

14 .

Blue Party

15 .

Farmers Party

16 .

Pro Patria

17 .

Forest Party

18 .

Party Moodukad

19 .

Farmers Assembly

20 .

Estonian Future

21 .

Conservative Republican Party

22 .

Russian Party

23 .

Estonian Development Party

01 .

All Ukrainian Political Alliance "State Independence of Ukraine"

02.

Civil Congress of Ukraine

03.

Democratic Party of Ukraine

04 .

Communist Party of Ukraine

05 .

Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists

06 .

Constitutional Democratic Party of Ukraine

07 .

Liberal Party of Ukraine

08.

Liberal Democratic Party of Ukraine

09.

Narodny Rukh (Popular Movement) of Ukraine

10.

Peoples' Democratic Party of Ukraine

11 .

Nova Ukraina Association

12 .

Interregional Block for Reforms Party

13 .

Revival Democratic Party

14.

Green Party of Ukraine

15.

Party of Labor

16 .

Party of Slavic Unity of Ukraine

17.

Peasants Party of Ukraine

18 .

Social Democratic Party of Ukraine

19 .

Socialist Party of Ukraine

20 .

Ukranian Conservative Republican Party

21.

Ukranian National Assembly

22 .

Ukranian National Conservative Party

23.

Ukranian Party of Beer Lovers

24.

Ukranian Republican Party

25 .

Ukranian Peasant's Democratic Party

26.

Christian Democratic Party of Ukraine

01 .

Agrarian Party (Lapshin)

02 .

Power to the People (Ryzhkov)

03 .

Forward, Russia! (B. Fedorov)

04 .

Democratic Russia ( Starovoytova)

05 .

Democratic Choice of Russia-United Democrats(Gaidar)

06 .

Dershava

07 .

Women of Russia (Lahova)

08 .

For the Motherland (Polevanov)

09 .

Communist Party of the Russian Federation (Zyuganov)

10 .

Communists/Working Russia-for the Soviet Union (Anpylov)

11 .

Congress of Russian Communities (Skokov)

12 .

Left-Centrist Bloc (Ribkin)

13 .

Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia (Zhirinovsky)

14 .

Our Home is Russia (Chernomyrdin)

15 .

Republican Party of the Russian Federation ("Pamfilova-Gurov-Lysenko")

16 .

Party of Self-Government (Sv. Fedorov)

17 .

Trade Unions and Manufacturers-Union of Labor (Shmakov)

18 .

Yabloko [Apple] (Yavlinski)

01.

Cambio 90-Nueva Mayoria

02 .

UPP

03 .

AP

04 .

MDI

05 .

IU

06 .

PPC

07 .

APRA

08 .

FREPAP

09 .

FRENATRACA

10 .

Obras

11 .

CODE Pais Posible

01 .

Accion Democratica (AD)

02.

Social Christian Party (COPEI)

03 .

Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS)

04 .

Convergencia Nacional (CN)

05 .

La Causa Radical

01.

Partido Colorado

02 .

Partido Nacional

03 .

Nuevo Espacio

04 .

Frente Amplio

01.

NDC

02 .

NPP

03.

NIP

04.

NCP

05 .

PNC

06 .

PHP

07 .

Eagle

08 .

GDRP

01 .

Bicol Saro

02.

Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL)

03 .

Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino (LDP)

04 .

Lakas Ng Tao-National Union of Christian Democrats - United Moro Democratic Party (Lakas-NUCD-UMDP)

05 .

Lapiang Manggagawa

06.

Liberal Party (LP)

07 .

Nationalist People's Coalition (NPC)

08.

Nacionalista Party (NP)

09 .

Natural Law Party

10 .

Partido Ng Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas (PDSP)

11 .

Partido Ng Masang Pilipino (PMP)

12 .

Partido Panaghiussa (PP)

13.

People's Reform Party (PRP)

14 .

Philippine Democratic Party - Lakas Ng Bayan (PDP-Laban)

15 .

Hindi Bumoboto NG Partido

01 .

National Youth League of Moldova

02.

Agrar-Democratic Party of Moldova

03 .

Union of Youth of Moldova

04 .

Association of Political Prisoners, Participants of the WWII, Victims of Communist Repression

05 .

Womans Association of Moldova

06.

National-Christian Party

07.

Democratic Movement Demnitatea

08.

Christian-Democratic Popular Front

09 .

Democratic Christian League of Women

10 .

Ecological Party Alianta Verde

11 .

Equal Rigths Movement Unitate-Edinstvo

12 .

Social-Democratic Party

13 .

Socialist Party

14 .

Organization of Christian-Democratic Youth

15 .

Republican Party

16 .

Radical-Democratic Organization of Youth

17 .

Liberal Party of Moldova

18 .

Party of Democratic Forces of the Moldovan Republic

19 .

National Party of the Gagauses

20 .

National Farmers Party

21 .

National Liberal Party

22 .

Party of Reforms

23 .

League of Pedagogues of Moldova

24 .

Party of Economic Rebirth of Moldova

25 .

Pacifistic Movement of Moldova

26 .

Party of the Communists of the Moldovan Republic

27 .

Christian-democratic Farmers Party

28 .

Centrist Democratic Party of Rebirth

29 .

Peoples Party Vatan

30 .

Alliance of Democratic Youth

31 .

Party of the Progressive Forces of Moldova

32 .

Party of Social Progress

33.

Party of Rebirth and Agreement

34 .

Political Movement Femeia Moldovei

35 .

Party of Socialist Action

01 .

Agrarian Party

02 .

Block Agordzineba

03 .

United Communist Party

04 .

Republican Party (Khaindrava)

05 .

National-Democratic Party

06 .

Fraction National-Democrat

07 .

Block XXI Century

08 .

Socialist Party

09 .

Social-Democratic Party

10 .

Society "Lemi"

11 .

United Republican Party (Natadze)

12 .

Round Table

13 .

Georgian Citizens Union

14 .

Refomers' Union

15.

Georgian Traditionalists Union

16 .

National Independence Party

17 .

Merab Kostava Society

18 .

Liberal-Democratic National Party

19 .

Llia Chavchavadze Society

20.

Union of the God's Children

21 .

Christian Democratic Union

22 .

Conservative Party (Monarchists)

01 .

National Movem.

02 .

Dashnaktsutiun

03 .

Communist P.

04 .

Liberal Dem.P.

05.

Nat.Dem.Union

06 .

Un.Nat.Selfdet.

07.

Democratic P.

08.

S.Dem. Gnchakian

09.

Republican P.

10 .

Chr.Dem.Union

11.

Un.Constit.Law

12.

Royal Party Scient.Prod.Un.

13.

Undocumented code

14.

Artsakh-Aiastan Shamiram

01 .

Ieni Azerbaijan

02 .

Nat.Independ.P.

03 .

Peoples Front

04.

Nat.Statehood P.

05.

Ana Veten

06.

Owners Dem. P.

07 .

Liberal Party

08 .

Musavat

09 .

United Azerb.

10 .

P.Revival/Devel.

11 .

Social Solidar.

12 .

Dorgu Iol

13 .

Iurddash

14 .

P. Dem. Independ.

15 .

All for Azerb.

7 .

Undocumented code

01 .

PLD

02 .

PRD

03 .

PRSC

04.

PQD

05 .

UD

06 .

PRI

07 .

Nueva Izquierda

08 .

PTD

01 .

Awami League

02 .

Bangladesh Nationalist Party

03 .

Jatyia Party

04 .

Jamait Islami Party (Bangladesh Islamic Assembly)

05 .

Any other party

01 .

Union Patriotica

02 .

Conservador

03 .

Liberal

04 .

Cristiano

05 .

Independent candidates

06 .

M-19

1.

Liberal

2 .

Conservador

3 .

Independiente /civico

4 .

M-19

5 .

Union Patriotica

6 .

Other

7 .

None

9 .

dk/na

01 .

Partido Popular (PP)

02.

Partido Socialista Obrero Espanol (PSOE)

03.

Centro Democratico y Social (CDS)

04 .

Izquierda Unida (IU)

05 .

Ecologistas (Verdes)

06 .

Convergencia y Union (CIU)

07 .

Esquerra Republicana de Cataluna (ERC)

08 .

Partido Nacionalista Vasco (PNV)

09 .

Eusko Alkartasuna (EA)

10 .

Herri Batasuna (HB)

11 .

Union Alavesa (UA)

12 .

Plazandrea

13 .

Union del Pueblo Navarro (UPN)

14 .

Coalicion Gallega (CG)

15 .

Bloque Nacionalista Gallega (BNG)

16 .

Partido Andalucista (PA)

17 .

Partido Andaluz Progresista (PAP) (Pacheco)

18 .

Coalicion Canarias (CC)

19 .

Centro Canarias Independiente (CCI)

20 .

Asociacion Independiente Canaria (AIC)

21 .

Asamblea Majorera (AM)

22 .

Partido Nacionalista Canario (PNC)

23 .

Izquierda Canaria (ICAN)

24 .

Partido Regionalista Cantabro (PRC)

25 .

Partido Aragones Regionalista (PAR)

26 .

Extremadura Unida (EU)

27 .

Union Valenciana (UV)

01 .

Socialist Party of Serbia

02.

Serbian Renewal Movement

03 .

Democratic Party

04 .

Serbian Radical Party

05 .

Democratic Party of Serbia

06.

Civil Alliance of Serbia

07 .

New Democracy

08 .

Yugoslav Left

09.

Democratic Alliance of Voivodina Hungarians

10 .

Party of Democratic Action for Sandzak

11 .

Party of Democratic Action for Yugoslavia

12 .

Democratic Alliance of Kosovo

13 .

Democratic Party of Socialists

14 .

Peoples' Party

15 .

Liberal Alliance

16 .

Serbian Radical Party for Montenegro

17 .

Other Party

18 .

Coalition Socialist Party of Serbia, Yugoslav Left, New Democracy

19 .

Coalition Zajedno

20.

Coalition For Voivodina

21 .

List for Sandzak

22 .

Coalition Peoples' Accord

23 .

Serbian Alliance

24 .

Communist of Montenegro

01 .

Democratic Union (HDZ)* [Tudjman]

02 .

Social-Liberal (HSLS)

03.

Social Democratic (SDP)

04 .

Peasant Party (HSS)*

05.

Istrian Democrats (IDS)

06 .

People's Party (HNS)

07 .

Party of the Right (HSP)

08 .

Independent Democrats (HND)

09 .

Christian Democrats (HKDU)

10 .

Action of Social Democrats (ASH)

11 .

SDU

12 .

HSP 1861.

13 .

SBSH

14 .

Dalmatian Action

15 .

"Neku Drugu"

01.

COMMUNIST

02 .

Socialist (and Left Radicals)

03 .

Rally for the Republic

04.

Republican Party , Social Democratic Center, Center Radicals

05.

Ecologist Party

06 .

Extreme Left (PSU, Workers' Battle, etc.)

07.

Right

01.

Conservative

02 .

Labour

03 .

Liberal

04 .

Nationalist

01.

Christian Democrats CDU/CSU

02 .

Social Democrats SPD

03 .

Free Democrats FDP

04 .

Greens

00.

Communist/Socialist/Social Democrat (PCI/PSI/PSDI) and N.A.

[0 and 10 codes appear to have been erroneously merged]

01 .

Republican (PRI)

02 .

Christian Democrat (DC)

03 .

Liberal (PLI)

04 .

Social Movement-National Right (MSI)

05.

Radical (PR)

06.

Proletarian Democracy (DP)

Documentation not available

01 .

Social Democrats

02.

Radical Left

03 .

Conservative Peoples party

04 .

Justice party

05 .

Socialist People's party

06.

Communist

07.

Center Democrats

08 .

Christian People's party

09 .

Liberals

01.

undocumented code

02 .

Ecologist

03.

Communist

04 .

Christian People's (CVP,PSL)

05.

Socialist (PS/SP)

06.

Liberal-Flemish, Liberal-French (PVV, PLP)

07.

Flemish and Walloon Nationalists (VU,FDF,RW)

09.

Democratic Union for the Respect of Labor

01 .

Union of the Democratic Center UCD

02 .

Socialist PSOE

03 .

Communist PCE

04.

Popular Alliance

01 .

Fianna Fail

02 .

Fine Gael

03 .

Labour

Documentation not available

01 .

Republican

02.

Democrat

03.

Independent

01.

Progressive Conservative

02 .

Liberal

03.

New Democrats

documentation not available

voting intention not ascertained.

documentation not available

voting intention not ascertained.

documentation not available

documentation not available

voting intention not ascertained

voting intention not ascertained

documentation not available

documentation not available

documentation not available

documentation not available

01.

EXTREME LEFT

02.

COMMUNIST

03 .

Socialist

04 .

Left Radical Movement (MRG)

05 .

Radical Party

06 .

Social Democratic Center (UDF, CDS)

07 .

Republican Party (UDF, RPR)

08 .

Rally for the Republic (RPR)

09 .

National Front

10 .

Ecologist Movement

01.

Conservative

02 .

Labour

03 .

Social Liberal Democrats

04 .

Social Democratic Party

05 .

Nationalist

06 .

Green Party

07 .

Communist Party

01 .

Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU)

02 .

Social Democrats (SPD)

03 .

Free Democrats

04 .

The Greens

05 .

The Republicans

06 .

Communist

07 .

National Democrats

01 .

Christian Democrats

02 .

Proletarian Democrats

03.

Italian Social Movement/ National Right

04.

Communist

05 .

Liberal

06 .

Radicals

07 .

Republicans

08 .

Social Democrats

09 .

Socialist

10 .

Green List

11 .

Local Ethnic lists: e.g., South Tyrol People's Party, Sardinian Action

12 .

Regional list (e.g., Lombard League)

13 .

Retired peoples party

01 .

PvdA-Labor

02 .

CDA-Christian Democrats

03 .

VVD-Liberals

04 .

D'66-DEMOCRATS, '66

05 .

Groen Links- Green Left

06 .

SGP-Political Reformed Party

07 .

GPV-Reformed Political Union

08 .

RPF-Reformed Political Federation

09 .

SP

10 .

Center Party

11 .

Center Democrats (Right-wing)

01 .

Social Democrats

02 .

Radical Left

03 .

Conservative People's Party

04 .

Justice Party (Single Tax)

05 .

Socialist People's Party

06 .

Greens

07 .

Humanists

08 .

International Socialist Workers party

09 .

Communist

10 .

Marxist-Leninist party

11 .

Center-Democrats

12 .

Common Course (anti-immigration)

13 .

Christian Peoples

14 .

Liberal party

15 .

Left Socialists

16 .

Progress Party

01 .

Catholic People's party (Flemish) CVP

02 .

Christian Social party (Walloon) PSC

03 .

Socialist party (Flemish) SP

04 .

Socialist party (Walloon) PS

05 .

Party for Freedom and Progress PVV

06 .

Liberal Reformation party PRL

07 .

People's Union (Flemish) VU

08 .

FRENCH-SPEAKING FRONT FDF

09 .

Walloon party RW

10 .

Flemish Bloc

11 .

Live Differently (Flemish Ecologists) AGALEV

12 .

Ecologists (Walloon) ECOLO

01 .

Popular party PP

02 .

Democratic and Social Center CDS

03 .

Socialists PSOE

04 .

United Left IU

05 .

Convergence and Union [Catalan] CIU

06 .

Catalan Republican Left ERE

07 .

Basque Nationalist Party PNV

08 .

Basque Solidarity EA

09 .

Galician Coalition (CG)

10 .

Cantabrian Reginalist party (PRC)

11 .

Aragon Regionalist party (PAR)

12 .

Navarrese People's Union (UPN)

13 .

Andalucian party (PA)

14 .

Valencian Union (UV)

15 .

United Extremadura (EU)

16 .

Independent Canary Association (ACI)

17 .

United People [Basque] (HB)

18 .

Basque Left (EE)

19 .

Galician Nationalist Bloc (BNG)

20 .

Ruiz Mateos Electoral Association

21.

Ecologists (Greens)

23 .

Blank ballot

01.

Popular Party PP

02.

Democratic and Social Center CDS

03 .

Socialists PSOE

04 .

United Left IU

05 .

Party of the workers of Spain- United Communists

06 .

Convergence and Unity CiU

07 .

Catalan Republican Left ERC

08 .

Basque Nationalist Party PNV

09 .

Basque Solidarity EA

10 .

Basque Left (EE)

11 .

United People HB

12 .

Navarrese People's Union UPN

13 .

Galician Nationalist bloc BNG

14 .

Galician Left PSG

15 .

Aragon Regionalist party PAR

16 .

Valencian Union

17 .

Andalucian Party PA

18 .

Greens/Ecologists

01 .

Fianna Fail

02 .

Fine Gael

03 .

Labour

04 .

Workers' Party

05 .

Progressive Democrats

06 .

Green Party

07 .

Sinn Fein

01 .

Official Unionist

02 .

Democratic Unionist

03 .

SDLP

04 .

Alliance

05 .

Sinn Fein

06 .

Worker's Party

07 .

N.I. Conservative Party

01 .

Republican

02.

Democrat

03 .

Independent

04 .

None

05 .

Libertarian

01 .

Liberal

02 .

Progressive Conservative

03 .

N.D.P.

04 .

Reform Party

07 .

Not eligible

01 .

Liberal Democratic Party

02 .

Japan Socialist Party

03 .

Komeito (Clean Government Party)

04 .

Japan Democratic Socialist Party

05 .

Japan Communist Party

06 .

United Social Democratic Party

07 .

United Progressive Liberals

08 .

Japanese Trade Unions Confederation

01 .

Institutional Revolutionary Party PRI

02 .

National Action Party PAN

03 .

Democratic Revolutionary Party PRD

04 .

Cardenist Front of National Reconstuction PFCRN

05 .

Popular Socialist Party PPS

06 .

Authentic Party of the Mexican Revolution PARM

07 .

Other

09 .

Don't Know

01 .

COSATU (Congress of South African Trade Unions)

02 .

CP (Conservative Party)

03 .

DP (Democratic Party)

04 .

Inkatha Movement

05 .

MDM (Mass Democratic Movement)

06 .

NP (National Party)

07 .

PAC (Pan Africanist Congress)

08 .

SACP (South African Communist Party)

09 .

UDF (United Democratic Front)

10 .

ANC (African National Congress)

11 .

AWB (Afrikaner Resistance Movement)

12 .

AZAPO (Azanian People's Organisation)

01 .

MDF - Hungarian Democratic Forum

02 .

SZDSZ - Alliance of Free Democrats

03 .

FKgP - Independent Smallholders' Party

04 .

FIDESZ - Federation of Young Democrats

05 .

KDNP - Christian Democratic People's Party

06 .

MSZP - Hungarian Socialist Party (ex-Communists)

08 .

Undocumented

01 .

Labour Party (DNA)

02 .

Progressive Party (FRP)

03 .

Conservative Party (H)

04 .

Christian Party (KPF)

05 .

Norwegian Communist Party (NKP)

06 .

Marxist-Leninist Party (ML)

07 .

Center Party (SP)

08 .

Socialist Party (SV)

09 .

Liberal Party (V)

01 .

Moderate Coalition (conservative)

02 .

People's Party (liberal)

03.

Center Party

04 .

Christian Democrats

05 .

Green Party

06 .

Social Democratic Labor

07 .

Left Social Democratic Party (communist)

01 .

Social Democrats

02 .

Progressive Democrats

03 .

Independence Party (Conservative and Liberal)

04 .

People's Alliance

06 .

Women's Alliance

07 .

Flokk Mannsins

09 .

Citizen's Party

Voting intention not asked

01 .

Social Democratic Party

02 .

National Coalition (conservative)

03 .

Center Party

04 .

Left-wing Alliance (Communist and Left socialists)

05 .

Swedish People's party

06 .

Rural party

07 .

Christian Union

08 .

Greens

09 .

Pensioners' party

10 .

Liberal People's party

11 .

Constitutional Party of the Right

Voting intention not asked

01 .

Christian Dems (didn't exist)

02 .

Social Dems (didn't exist)

03 .

PZPR - Polish United Workers Party

04 .

Peasants (ZSL)

05 .

Democratic Party (SD)

06 .

Citizens Committee of Solidarity

01..

Alliance of Independents

02. .

Christian Demmocrats

03. .

Socialist

04. .

Democratic Union of the Center

05. .

Labor Party (communist)

06. .

Radical

07. .

Liberal

08. .

Ecologist

09. .

National Action/Vigilance

10. .

Evangelical Protestant

11. .

Republican Movement

01 .

PMDB-Party of Brazilian Democratic Movement

02 .

PT-Workers' Party

03 .

PSDB-Brazilian Social Democracy

04 .

PDT-Democratic Labor Party

05 .

PDS-Social Democratic Party

06 .

PRN-National Reconstruction Party

07 .

PTB-Brazilian Labor Party

08 .

PFL-Liberal Front

01 .

Social Democratic Party SDP

02 .

National Republican Convention NRC

01 .

Christian Democratic Party PDC

02 .

National Renovation RN

03 .

Socialists

04 .

Union of Independent Democrats UDI

05 .

Communists

06 .

Radicals

01 .

Communist Party

02 .

Belorussian People's Front

03 .

Social Democrat Party

04 .

Greens or Environmentalists

05 .

Liberals

06 .

Conservatives

07 .

Christian Democrats

08 .

Belorussian Worker's Union

09 .

Farmer's Party

10 .

Oganizations like Pamyat

01 .

Indian National Congress

02.

Indian Congress (Socialist)

03 .

Janata Dal (People's Party)

04 <